I have still not recovered from the election of 2000. It was brutal, as you know. 2004 was almost as bad. Now, another election is just around the corner. I can’t stand it.
I believe in learning about the candidates and issues. I vote, every time, but something is wrong with the process today. It’s too long. It’s hateful, mean-spirited, dishonest, and sometimes criminal. Lies can be found on both sides of the fence.
Don’t you find it interesting that each election cycle, every candidate says we need a “change” But nothing seems to change. What have the Republicans done since the 1994 revolution? Not much from my count.
One reason change is so slow to come is that elected officials know we can only vote one of two ways: Democrat or Republican. Looking back over time I have to agree with my friend Howard Phillips. He said the choice between Democrat and Republican is between “losing and losing slower.” Even with the Republicans in power, we are still sliding left. I’m much more conservative than most Republicans so where can I go?[1]
Something has got to give. We need to try something different other than simply dividing over left and right, right and wrong. I have an idea that I want to share with you, but give me a minute to set the stage.
Our political system appears to be broken beyond repair. Recent D.C stories (soap operas) abound revealing corruption, favoritism, and partisan politics beyond reason or belief. Political hypocrisy seems to have no bounds. Let me offer just a few examples.
A month or so ago, Georgia Representative Cynthia McKinney struck a Capital Hill Police officer. She immediately blamed the officer for the incident and played the race card. According to McKinney, this police officer had the audacity to not recognize her as she entered a secure area. After her redo who could?[2]According to her, she was a victim being a black female. The jury, literally, is still out on this one.[3] Where would you or I be if we had slugged the policeman?
Soon after this episode, Representative Patrick Kennedy of Rhode Island crashed his vehicle at 2:45 AM one morning and exited his car staggering. He claims he can’t remember the event at all, but he was aware enough at the time to claim his Congressional immunity. He was, according to his testimony, on official business and was late for a vote. Voting was completed almost three hours before. Being intoxicated does help time fly.
The Capital Hill police once again were involved. This time they gave the Representative the “tender touch” treatment. Instead of putting him in the clink where we would be, they gave him a ride home and attempted to cover up the incident.
Once this story got hot, Democratic leadership visited with Kennedy to work damage control. He hastily confessed his addiction to prescription medication and entered rehab. The democratic leadership wanted this incident out of the news as quickly as possible. After all, it’s the Republicans that reflect the culture of corruption.
This week we are learning about the William Jefferson (D/LA) bribery scandal. Beyond the alleged crime itself, this incident has highlighted the double standard that is in place in D.C. The congressman’s response to the FBI entering his office to seize evidence of bribery reveals the basic presupposition our leaders have in common:Jefferson said "There is no real authority for it."[4]Jefferson criticized the government for using police powers to enter the office of a member of Congress.
Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert, Nancy Pelosi, and others agree with Jefferson. For some reason our leaders don’t understand why they should be subject to the same laws we, the little people are. This view is a common assumption among Members of Congress.
We won’t spend time on this here but let’s not forget the many other scandals of recent decades. There was the post office scandal, House banking scandal, abscam, the current Abramoff scandal, and others. We do have short memories don’t we?
My point here is not to catalog the ubiquitous hypocrisies of our leaders. There are plenty of books written on this. What I do want to do is explore an idea of how we can put the fear of God back into them this fall. Let them panic for a change.
My idea is not something that just popped into my mind recently. I’ve thought about this for years. Maybe it is new, maybe it isn’t, but I think it could work. The challenge is to get this idea into the minds of mainstream America. Maybe you can help if you agree.
This has nothing to do with partisan politics. This has nothing to do with good elected officials versus bad ones. This has to do with reminding our leaders that the power really does reside with us, the people. This has to do with our getting a better return on the billions of dollars we entrust to our leaders every year. This has to do with taking the Constitution seriously.
I think you will agree that truth, justice, and the American way was certainly reflective of Superman, but these things don’t play well or often on Capitol Hill. I know, the rhetoric sounds good. Those in power know what to say. They tell us what we want to hear, but when we watch what actually happens, what they do, how they vote, we see the deception[5]. Today, we are not that important in the process except to be used in helping our leaders stay in power. Truth is irrelevant[6]. Right and wrong is not important. What is important is staying in power. If you don’t believe this, I’d skip to another article.
We have to put this in perspective. There are only 535 Representatives and Senators.[7] There are almost 300 million of us. I realize that might doesn’t always make right, but come on. Who should have priority here? Them or us? Who should be held to a higher standard? Who should serve whom?
Ok, here’s my idea. I call it “Operation Turnover.” It is simple. All we do is vote out every incumbent good and bad. If you throw out a Democrat and want another one back in office, that’s fine. Vote for him or her.The same thing goes for a Republican. The point is to clean house, from corner to corner. I understand that this isn’t fair to those officials who are honest, and truly representing their constituents. It is fair to us. And we are who count most under our Constitution. They work for us. Don’t forget that. This is self-defense at this point. Thomas Jefferson said, "[The people] are in truth the only legitimate proprietors of the soil and government."
Why would this be a good thing to do? First, it would break up the “good ol boy” networks. It would reduce seniority to zero and it would remind our elected officials that their jobs are not secure and that we, the people, are more important than their careers. It will also force both parties to become more sensitive to all the people.
Operation Turnover would also bring fresh blood into Congress, a new crew who would be much more sensitive and attentive to us. The new respect for the people won’t last forever, but it will for a time to come. It will scare them into doing what they should have been doing all along.
I realize that even if successful this isn’t a perfect plan. Former Representatives and Senators would probably get back in office. Those who would be new to Congress would probably hire entrenched aides and staff. But, the message would be clear and I think the benefits would override the negatives. Something has got to shake up the system. We, the voters, are the only ones who can do it.
If Operation Turnover gains traction and those running for office get wind of it, it will be fascinating to hear their arguments as to why it would be irresponsible, detrimental to America, and downright evil for us to do such a thing. This could be fun!
This is what I think. What about you?
[1] I know that some would say I could vote for the Constitution Party or some other third party. I appreciate that but I still can’t get past seeing that as a vote of conscience but one that is really going (by default) to one of the two major parties. Some of my best friends are members of third parties and urge me to join them. I would join in a minute if I thought my vote would really count. I pray that one day one of these Godly parties will have a national presence.
[2] If you Google this story and see the before and after photos of Rep. McKinney you will see that her physical transformation was drastic.
[3] At the time of this writing the Grand Jury is investigating this incident.
[5] See my article “The Age of Deception” in the archives.
[6] For more on this read Hill Rat by John L. Jackey. This book details the confessions of a Democratic Congressional aid.It is very insightful. He states up front that truth has no place in the modern Congress.
[7] 435 Representative and 100 Senators. These same principles apply to the local level but I am concentrating only on the national government.
Disclaimer: Worldview Weekend, Christian Worldview Network and its columnists do not necessarily endorse or agree with every opinion expressed in every article posted on this site. We do however, encourage a healthy and friendly debate on the issues of our day. Whether you agree or disagree, we encourage you to post your feedback by using the feedback button.
Great Idea! In fact, I had the exact same idea myself! (great minds think alike!) I will send this article to those in my address book. Click here to reply to this post
Iam a Christian Conservitive. I think the big problem is that the terms conservitive and liberal do not mean any thing,you can not tell the difference any more. Both parties do not care about right and wrong only holding onto power. I personally like your plan but the american voters have became just as partisian as the politicians. Click here to reply to this post
Re: Election 2006: A New Voting Strategy
Posted On: 05/31/06 05:28:56 PM
Age 56, WA
Your idea on the surface is interesting, but it won't work. The most entrenched Senators would not be voted out and we would lose the few that have our best interest at heart. 3rd party candidates won't win so a vote for them only assures more Democrats. Our best hope is to put enough Republicans in the Senate to make it filibuster proof and continue to get more conservative judges appointed. I am dissappointed in the performance of our Government, but if we alow it to slip back into Democratic control it will be even harder to right the ship. Click here to reply to this post
Re: Election 2006: A New Voting Strategy
Posted On: 05/31/06 01:30:32 PM
Age 20, VA
There seems to be a misconception that a "Republican-controlled" Congress reflects the views of the Republican Party and a "Democrat-controlled" Congress reflects the views of the Democratic Party. In reality, Congress generally reflects the most moderate members of its controlling party, because the minority party can still win if majority-party moderates defect. For example, our current Congress is controlled by the 6th most liberal Republican, because 45 Democrats (counting Jeffords who votes with them) + 6 liberal Republicans > 49 mainstream Republicans. Therefore, every vote is decided by the 6th most liberal Republican. This is called the Median Voter Theorem and is the cornerstone of Public Choice theory. The implication of this is if we want Congress to move to the right, we need to give the Republicans a larger majority, so that instead of just needing 6 RINOs to triumph, the Democrats would need 7, 8, or more.
By the way, in case you're wondering why the Republican Party doesn't impose party discipline, I can tell you that in two words: Jim Jeffords. If the Republicans are too hard on their most liberal members, the Democrats will be able to buy them off. Rather than persuading the RINOs to change their votes, such pressure would only allow them to retain control under a new Democratic Congress.
Your strategy, meanwhile, makes no sense. You seem to have the impression that we can vote for a member of an incumbent's party other than the incumbent. In reality, general elections only field one candidate from each party. Some people seem to think that voting for minor parties will intimidate the Republicans into become more conservative. This will not work because the Republican leadership does not control Congress - the liberal RINOs are the ones with the deciding vote. In reality, voting for third parties will only get more Democrats elected so that instead of the Senate being controlled by the 6th most liberal Republican, it will be controlled by the most liberal Republican or even one of the least liberal Democrats.
And additional problem with your strategy is that, if it works, it would prove disastrous for the country because all of the prominent politicians would be unknowns who would be easily defined by the liberal media. Conservatives would be thought of as "theocrats", moderates as "conservatives", and extreme liberals as "mainstream" because they would have no record by which to rebut the media's definition of them as such. It takes a lot of effort to defend a new legislator against such characterizations, so how can we possibly simultaneously defend all of the new legislators that you have us elect.
To avoid making such mistakes in the future, I recommend that you:
A. Do not consider organizations (such as parties) to be unified entities whose members all have the same viewpoint. Organizational entities are a legal fiction; in reality, organizations are just a bunch of loosely-related individuals who happen to prefer the same label. Saying that the views of the 6th most liberal Republican are those of "congressional Republicans" is like saying that the UCC reflects the views of normal Christianity.
B. Study Public Choice theory. You cannot solve problems in government until you first determine who it is controlling government. Parties do not determine the outcome of votes - individual legislators (specifically, the median legislators) do.
C. Look at ALL effects of your proposed action. Voting third party will not influence the 6th most liberal Republican, but it will let liberals win more seats, moving the median position further to the left. Getting rid of all incumbents will not remove the incentive to produce pork as taxpayer-funded job security, but it will provide the media with a chance to define the new legislators as they see fit. Click here to reply to this post
Re: Re: Election 2006: A New Voting Strategy
Posted On: 06/04/06 10:11:36 AM
Age 40, K
The idea was that when you get rid of all the incumbants,Jim Jeffords included you reset to zero all the variables that make the current congress so screwed up. As for the media, let them say what they want. They will anyway and you can't stop it.
Any one who gets elected will have to define themselves by what the do and how the vote.
((Your strategy, meanwhile, makes no sense. You seem to have the impression that we can vote for a member of an incumbent's party other than the incumbent. In reality, general elections only field one candidate from each party.)) (cut from your post)
The idea here is that it may be true that you can't vote for any other than the incumbant ..**from that party** so vote for the other party. any party..just vote out the incumbant In office..all of them
In a general election.. vote out the incumbant...what ever it takes.
some may not like the idea but it seems that he is right about one thing.
they only have one job...getting re-elected.
and they will take money from anyone promise what ever, say anything..do anything...
(except the right thing.. the morally correct thing)to get re-elected.
Abraham Linloln once said" "If you want to know a mans character,give him some power and see what he does with it." Emphasis on "does" Judge by what they do.
Old Abe was right ..but he failed to mention how to get rid of those who seem to be able to hold on to power once they have it.
Look at Ted Kennedy. What a Wacko Click here to reply to this post
Re: Re: Election 2006: A New Voting Strategy
Posted On: 06/04/06 09:52:38 AM
Age 40, K
The idea was that when you get rid of all the incumbants,Jim Jeffords included you reset to zero all the variables that make the current congress so screwed up. As for the media, let them say what they want. They will anyway and you can't stop it.
Any one who gets elected will have to define themselves by what the do and how the vote.
((Your strategy, meanwhile, makes no sense. You seem to have the impression that we can vote for a member of an incumbent's party other than the incumbent. In reality, general elections only field one candidate from each party.)) Click here to reply to this post
Apparently the author follows only the major liberal news, with liberal selection of news & without memory or Christian analysis of his own. Successes of the current Conservatives in Federal office include:
Two new Supreme Court Justices
Increased Federal support, both legal & $, for Christian schools & home schooling
Strong economy we have, while media constantly talk to convince people to vote Dimocrat for fears of economy
Concealed weapon carry in 38+ states without Federal courts interference
Protection of Church buildings & schools from Cities, counties & zoning boards
Near 5 years without airplanes hitting buildings.
I could go on, but if the author chooses to listen to media instead of reading the record of this Administration & Congress, he deserves 4+ years of liberals.
Bush is not perfect, has not done it all for us Christians. Bush should be able to say Christ is the only way to eternity with God, but just think of the riots that statement would cause. Then consider how much Bush has been able to do. Click here to reply to this post
Re: Re: Election 2006: A New Voting Strategy
Posted On: 06/01/06 09:51:59 AM
Age 58, GA
Thanks for your feedback. But FYI, I never listen to the main stream media. I listen to FOX news most of the day, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity. I read the Wall Street Journal, etc. As I mentioned in an earlier article, I don't even trust the main stream media for the weather unless I have a window to look out of. I do appreciate the dialogue. Blessings. Click here to reply to this post
Re: Election 2006: A New Voting Strategy
Posted On: 05/31/06 10:45:22 AM
Age 45, CA
Why continue to vote Democrat or Republican? How about voting Libertarian, which is basically about upholding our Constitution and less Governmental power. See <tomreed.org> for more info. That's my husband, doing his duty for our country.
Blessings, Brenda Click here to reply to this post
Re: Election 2006: A New Voting Strategy
Posted On: 05/31/06 09:28:09 AM
Age 57, VA
I think it is a great idea! Not even our Republican officials are listening to the people about issues so what is there to lose. What can we do to get OPERATION TURNOVER started? Just one of many ideas- I know James Kennedy sends out e-mails to his list and has a prewritten e-mail for his readers to send to their e-mail lists and Representatives. Why not do that? I know that TV program Daniel did not stay on the air because of the responses. Lets go for it!!! We are in a mess. Certainly Deut. 18:9 and Deut 28 clearly apply to our Nation. "When you enter the land which the Lord your God gives you, you shall not learn to imitate the detestable things of those nations. There shall not be found among you anyone who makes his son or his daughter pass through the fire, one who uses divination, one who practices witchcraft, or one who interprets omens, or a sorcerer, or one who cast spells, or a medium, or a spiritist, or one who calls up the dead. For whoever does these things is detestable to the Lord; and because of these things the Lord your God will drive them out before you. You shall be blameless before the Lord your God. For those nations which you shall dispossess, listen to those who practice witchcraft and to diviners, but as for you, the Lord your God has not allowed you to do so. Deut 28: 15 " But it shall come about, if you will not obey The Lord your God to observe to do all His commandments and His statutes with which I charge you today, that all these curses shall come upon you and overtake you." It is as if the devil has invaded our country. First spiritually and now physically. We have to do something. It's no different than Flight 93. Sometimes you just have to take measures into your own hands for the greater cause, despite the possible losses. Let's Roll! Click here to reply to this post
Re: Re: Election 2006: A New Voting Strategy
Posted On: 06/01/06 06:48:18 PM
Age 58, GA
Thanks for your feedback and support. Maybe Operation Turnover won't work in the end but we can sure scare those who think it might and who knows, it might. If we can get people talking about it it will have some benefit. We need to email talk shows, call in to talk shows and raise the idea. Please pass along the idea to email lists, etc. Thanks. Click here to reply to this post
Re: Election 2006: A New Voting Strategy
Posted On: 05/31/06 07:00:53 AM
Age 46, GA
I think it's a great idea.
I'm sad that, though you mentioned third parties, (in your footnote) you dismissed it as quickly. I'm changing my affiliation to the Constitution Party. I'm supporting them and telling all my friends about it.
Just think what could happen if everyone did that! Your vote would no longer be meaningless. Click here to reply to this post
Re: Election 2006: A New Voting Strategy
Posted On: 05/31/06 06:59:30 AM
Age 46, GA
I think it's a great idea.
I'm sad that, though you mentioned third parties, (in your footnote) you dismissed it as quickly. I'm changing my affiliation to the Constitution Party. I'm supporting them and telling all my friends about it.
Just think what could happen if everyone did that! Your vote would no longer be meaningless. Click here to reply to this post
Re: Election 2006: A New Voting Strategy
Posted On: 05/31/06 06:50:06 AM
Age 53, KY
It is already post primary in my state and therefore too late to toss out the incumbants at this level. My choice this fall is now between the pro-life incumbant member of congress or his pro-abortion opponent. Sorry I can't go along with your plan. I will be voting pro-life.
Neither Senator is up for re-election, but there again, they are both pro-life Republicans and their opponents in all past elections have been pro-abortion. This will probably fizzle your plan in other states as well. Think of something else. Click here to reply to this post
Woodrow Kroll, David Jeremiah,Sean McDowell, Josh McDowell, David Barton, Carl Kerby, Frank Harber, Kerby Anderson, and the Branson Family Reunion DVD Set! This is a $74.95 value for only $34.95! FREE worksheet with purchase!
Russell O'Quinn, Steve Saint, Dr. Michael Youssef, Dr. Erwin Lutzer, Bob Lepine, Star Parker, Kirk Cameron, Ray Comfort, and the Branson Family Reunion DVD Set! This is a $74.95 value for only $34.95!