Apparently Cedarville University’s doctrinal battles that included the firing of two tenured professors and some less than flattering national attention from the nation’s best read scholarly journal (the Chronicle of Higher Education) haven’t dampened spirits at the school. Here is a student-taken snapshot of Vice-President for Student Life, Dr. Carl Ruby, in costume as controversial, neo-monastic emerging star and political leftist, Shane Claiborne. Ruby’s surprising costume choice came at the annual campus event known as Elliv (that’s ville spelled backwards for you non-academic types) last Saturday. According to students attending, the college revels included Dr. Ruby playing Claiborne in a skit where he was silenced and not allowed to speak. In real life, Claiborne was recently dis-invited to the university much to the chagrin of Ruby and his academic cohorts on campus after concerns were raised from those inside and outside of Cedarville. Contrary to the disinformation that the only concerns were raised by “angry bloggers”, students, parents and alumni were concerned after Shane’s upcoming appearance was publicized online by a variety of sources.
While Ruby in his Claiborne rig-out may view all of this as material for cheap laughs, the real issues remain both for the institution and for those outside who are concerned about the influence of postmodernism on Cedarville faculty and administration. On the school’s website they have made a point to billboard their biblically conservative image with the words:
In a culture where truth is questioned, Cedarville is unwavering in its commitment to the inerrancy and authority of Scripture.
If the school is that zealous for truth, than Dr. Ruby should not be making excuses for Claiborne regarding this interview of Tony Campolo as Ruby did in this letter to the faculty where he lashed out at those concerned by Claiborne’s teachings. The interview simply speaks for itself, yet those who quoted from it in order to demonstrate the unbiblical nature of Campolo’s and Shane’s remarks were accused with that old canard, “They took it out of context”. (It’s frankly even worse in context.) Shane Claiborne just spoke along with Brian there-is-no-substitutionary-atonement McLaren two weeks ago at McLaren’s Shift conference at Willow Creek, and he met up with Brian there-is-no-hell McLaren again to speak at the Justice Revival in Columbus, Ohio this last weekend with Jim Wallis and the usual suspects from the Religious Left. Why is Shane not troubled that McLaren is actively attacking core Christian doctrine? Why is Shane willing to partner publicly at conferences with a man who rejects the substitutionary atonement of Jesus Christ? (See the Baptist Press report I posted earlier today on McLaren’s teachings at Willow Creek.) To deny the atonement of Christ on the cross for our sins is blasphemous. To deny the atonement is to spit on the face of Christ who died in agony in our place. This attack by McLaren on the Scriptures apparently bothers Mr. Claiborne, and his acolyte, Dr. Ruby, not at all. It’s all about social justice, you see. Who cares about what McLaren believes about eternity, hell, the cause for Christ’s death on the cross? Everything must change! We need a shift. It’s Kingdom Now, people. It’s only the temporal concerns that matter. Eternity is for loser, pie-in-the-sky fundamentalists, not cool “red-letter” Christians with organic hemp clothing made by hand.
Claiborne is also a friend and co-laborer with Dr. Tony Campolo who hails from Claiborne’s alma mater, Eastern College. Their new DVD, Simply Enough, has them working, shoulder to shoulder. Campolo, you will remember, is the one who suggested that Muslims and Christians may find common ground through mysticism in his book, Speaking My Mind.
“Beyond these models of reconciliation, a theology of mysticism provides some hope for common ground between Christianity and Islam. Both religions have within their histories examples of ecstatic union with God … I do not know what to make of the Muslim mystics, especially those who have come to be known as the Sufis. What do they experience in their mystical experiences? Could they have encountered the same God we do in our Christian mysticism?”
Shane Claiborne consistently keeps some very strange spiritual company. Cedarville’s Dr. Ruby isn’t concerned in the least. It’s all good.
Cedarville’s claim of staunch support for Scriptural authority and inerrancy rings hollow. If Scripture was authoritative at Cedarville, the leadership would keep postmodernism’s cheerleaders out of their school realizing the spiritual error they represent. As it stands, it appears the school’s leadership wants to have things both ways. They seem to want to appease those on the faculty and in their administration who are enamored with postmodernism while keeping the conservative alumni money and children flowing into their institution. They are on the very sharp horns of a dilemma.
Disclaimer: Worldview Weekend, Christian Worldview Network and its columnists do not necessarily endorse or agree with every opinion expressed in every article posted on this site. We do however, encourage a healthy and friendly debate on the issues of our day. Whether you agree or disagree, we encourage you to post your feedback by using the feedback button.
Yes, and I'm sure that Claiborne lovingly referring to wackos like Che Guevara and Malcolm X as examples of "radical love" really puts those "evil Republican capitalists" in their places, eh? I encourage you to think critically. Please don't drink the kool-aid. Click here to reply to this post
public error requires public rebuke
Posted On: 04/22/08 07:11:37 PM
Age 55, IL
Thanks, Ingrid. It's vital to put these issues on the table. The apostle Paul called out heretics by name in order to protect the churches. The stakes are too high, namely heaven vs. hell for young people who fall under the wrong teachers.
Some (like the previous post) would have you engage privately with public figures. Nope. Once someone goes public in print and speech, his ideas are fair game. And it's Biblical to rebuke error.
May God continue to bless your diligence. Click here to reply to this post
i disagree
Posted On: 04/23/08 01:27:55 PM
Age 21, MN
No. Public error requires private rebuke first. Jumping straight to public is a disguised form of laziness and pride because it is easier to write blogs and give speeches about the "heretics" then actually confronting them in person that maybe you might understand their beliefs before you rebuke them. -Dan Smith Click here to reply to this post
Questions
Posted On: 04/22/08 12:01:13 PM
Age 34, IL
I am just curious. Have you ever spoke to Shane Claiborne to ask him about his views and express your concerns? Have you spoke with Carl Ruby or Dr. Brown? I ask, because I would want to be sure that you have done that in private before you began to paint the picture that you perceive of them in public.
I would also be curious about this: "should we as conservative evangelicals not talk with others who are different then us?"
I guess I am just of the opinion that if what I believe to be true is really true, then engaging people who are different is not a threat, but beneficial. I have theological differences with Shane, but I would go to hear him speak when it is convenient because I know that there are areas that God will use him to stretch me in my practical living out of my faith.
If you have read Shane's first book and were not at all challenged with your faith then I would be surprised. That does not mean you have to agree with everything that he says.
Just my two cents if it is even worth that. Click here to reply to this post
Yes
Posted On: 04/22/08 07:14:28 PM
Age 41, WI
I had a half an hour conversation with Shane Claiborne today, as a matter of fact. (This is the columnist writing.) Shane and I both agree that good works are important and that compassion is important. But there is a critical and unbridgeable gap between me and Shane. Shane works arm in arm with heretics and calls them his friends. The Apostle Paul said that anyone who presents a false gospel, "let them be accursed." He repeated it twice for emphasis. Shane Claiborne does not believe that. Or to put it more clearly, he does not believe that Brian McLaren denying the doctrine of hell, the substitutionary atonement of Christ and the Second Coming of Jesus makes a false gospel. That much was made clear today in our conversation. Shane partners with McLaren at conferences like Jim Wallis' Justice Revival tour, and McLaren's Shift Experience which just took place at Willow Creek. We cannot embrace those who attack the doctrines of Scripture. "A heretic after one or two admonitions, reject", the Scriptures say. It does not say to befriend them, defend them, appear with them at youth conferences, it says, "reject". Shane is equally supportive of his mentor/teacher/friend, Dr. Tony Campolo who has written that we can find spiritual common ground through mysticism with pagans. I have written a 20-some page paper on the false teachings of Dr. Campolo who rejects the authority of Scripture and who gave birth, so to speak, to the emerging rebellion we see around us today. It is not a time for vagueness and dialoging with the enemies of Christ. What's needed is the clear light of Scripture on the path that blows away the fog of error and shows us the bedrock of truth God has given us. Click here to reply to this post
Thank you
Posted On: 04/24/08 10:41:36 AM
Age 34, IL
Ingrid, Thank you for your reply. I respect your opinions, but not sure that I agree with you completely.
I guess, I would have some questions to clarify because I am not meaning to misunderstand your or misinterpret you.
First, when you said that you spoke to Shane today, did that me that you called him to speak with him after I asked you so that you could say that you had? Not trying to assume, but it just sounded like that.
Also, are you saying that we should not be friends with those who believe differently than us or what is the point of seperation? Private and public? Or just public seperation? Shouldn't we be in dialogue with those who have differing views of scripture?
Last question for now, Shane promotes a politic of peace, a politic of being good stewards of our planet, and a politic of sharing and thinking of others economically and not just an individual gain based economic system.
Are you saying these things are contrary to the Bible? Are you saying that the political "right" always gets it right?
Again, thank you for your time and thoughts. Shalom. Click here to reply to this post
good challenge
Posted On: 04/22/08 03:49:41 PM
Age 21, MN
I am glad you brought that up because if the author really had talked to Shane, she would realize that he isn't a political leftist. Just cause he isn't republican doesn't mean he advocating liberal politics as theology. I don't think his writings are advocating political liberalism at all. So yes, you are right: confronting people in private first is the best way to address issues within the church. -Dan Smith Click here to reply to this post
Reply to Dan Smith
Posted On: 09/08/08 09:34:05 PM
Age 18, OH
The author never suggested that, simply because Claiborne "is not Republican" that he is automatically assumed to be a liberal. I'm not really sure why you seem to jump to conclusions here.
If you've read Claiborne's book, Irresistible Revolution, and you had any historical and/or Biblical context to weigh it against, you'd know EXACTLY what the author is referring to. Much of what Claiborne says takes Scripture and turns it on its head, taking it, not only out of context, but in a few instances, he claims things that are DIRECTLY OPPOSITE to what the Scripture says, when read in context.
Claiborne cherry-picks the absolute worst-case scenarios and seems to make stark exaggerations whenever possible to prove his points, even going as far as to enter this Republican National Convention and attempt to shout George W. Bush down. Now, regardless of political or economic ideology, I hardly believe this is representative of Jesus Christ. Perhaps if we all smoked hookah pipes and had COOL hemp clothes like Claiborne, we'd all reach nirvana and it would all SUDDENLY make sense =). Click here to reply to this post
Shane Claiborne IS a Political Leftist
Posted On: 04/23/08 07:33:45 PM
Age 41, WI
Anyone who doesn't believe Shane is a political leftist is speaking in complete ignorance. Shane travels with Jim Wallis and his left-wing Justice Revival, one of which was just held in Columbus, Ohio.
http://sojo.net/index.cfm?action=get_connected.justice_revivals&item=JR_main
Wallis bills these events as the Evangelical Left's answer to the Religious Right's monologue. As for Shane, you need only listen to his famous "Litany" prayer at his youth events where half-way in, his prayer turns into a political rant against everything from global warming, the use of our military, patriotism, capitalism, and activism by political conservatives. It is little surprise that Shane leans left as Shane has been, by his own admission, been mentored and taught by his dear friend, Dr. Tony Campolo who long ago embraced every liberal cause in the book. In Columbus, Shane told the assembled thousands that they should love others so that Christians won't be seen as "anti-gay, hypocritical, and judgmental". To Shane, opposing gay activism that brings homo-erotic propaganda into schools is "hate" and being "anti-gay". Defending God's view of the family in legislation that affects all of us is being "hypocritical and judgmental". Shane wants us to accept leftist views on the environment, on war, on economics, and he has plans for your wallet when he advocates the distribution of the world's wealth. He is gifted at redefining familiar terms, and ascribing his political views as "being like Christ", when in reality, he is doing the same thing he accuses the Religious Right of doing---baptizing an economic system, or a political position. It's just a case of being on the other side of the fence and claiming his side as the side of Jesus. Click here to reply to this post
Right again!
Posted On: 04/26/08 12:21:40 AM
Age 55, WI
Thanks again, Ingrid, for standing strong on what the Bible says. I don't recall Jesus ever first going to meet privately with the religious leaders he was calling out as wrong. Their 'doctrines' were public, so He wanted the public (people) to hear the correct side of things in public so they wouldn't be led astray any further. He didn't wait for a meeting of the minds to occur at some conference. Lives for eternity were too important to ignore; in fact, so important that He wanted them to hear the truth RIGHT NOW when He could simply tell them the truth because He is the Truth, Way, Life. Why should we respond any different? Anyway, republicans aren't very 'right' leaning anymore. I wish there was a real political party of candidates that stood for Biblical truth in action like the Founding Fathers so often did. Why else would they have quoted the Bible more than any other source in their speeches and writings? Dan and others, you're in our prayers. Click here to reply to this post
no he isnt
Posted On: 04/25/08 12:40:13 PM
Age 21, MN
Here's the thing. The Religious Right has had Christians by the balls for too long. All Christians ever hear is that they have to be Republican to be Christian. Shane, Jim Wallis, myself, all we are saying is that the Religious Right no longer gets to whine, cry, moan, condemn, and do all the other things they do whenever they don't get their way in the Church. Shane and Jim are NOT advocating political liberalism, but they trying to denounce the equation that Christian=Republican. There are aspects of the Republican agenda that is not of God and does not mimic Christ AT ALL. Shane and Jim want to expand the discussion a little bit so that people don't feel pigeonholed into a narrow political agenda. Plus, from Shane's "Irresistible Revolution" it seems like he acknowledges the inability of politics to help the Kingdom of God at all, which i agree. He doesn't advocate political liberalism, but freedom from politics, consumer culture, the American Dream, and all of these other secular constructs that stifle Kingdom-living. -Dan Smith Click here to reply to this post
Woodrow Kroll, David Jeremiah,Sean McDowell, Josh McDowell, David Barton, Carl Kerby, Frank Harber, Kerby Anderson, and the Branson Family Reunion DVD Set! This is a $74.95 value for only $34.95! FREE worksheet with purchase!
Russell O'Quinn, Steve Saint, Dr. Michael Youssef, Dr. Erwin Lutzer, Bob Lepine, Star Parker, Kirk Cameron, Ray Comfort, and the Branson Family Reunion DVD Set! This is a $74.95 value for only $34.95!