Three Presidents Have Warned Us About The Danger and Corruption of A Central Bank (The Federal Reserve)
Posted: 03/25/2008
Past Presidents Have Warned Us About The Danger and Corruption of A Central Bank (The Federal Reserve)
By Brannon Howse
Few Americans know the truth about the Federal Reserve. The reality is it is no more a part of the federal government than is Federal Express. The Federal Reserve is a private corporation run by private bankers.
Why should you care? Because as President Thomas Jefferson, President Andrew Jackson and President Woodrow Wilson all understood, a private central bank has the power to destroy our lives and steal our freedoms.
In March of 2008, the Federal Reserve loaned $30 billion dollars of taxpayer money to JP Morgan to buy Bear Stearns. This is nothing more than the rich bankers taking care of their rich banking friends while creating further inflation that limits your buying power of essentials such as food and clothing. In other words, the injections of liquidity by the feds in the billions of dollars have caused you and me to be the recipients of a “hidden tax” through the debasement of our currency.
I predicted months ago on my radio program that the federal government, at the encouragement of the Federal Reserve and with your tax dollars, would bail out many banks from their bad business decisions and thus have American citizens making their mortgage payments to a newly created government agency. There are now articles on financial websites suggesting that this very thing may now be in the works.
As you will see from the Presidential warnings below, the expansion of an all powerful central government is created through the unconstitutional and self serving fiscal policies of a central banking system.
Americans had better wake up to what is going on and start electing federal officials that have the understanding of President Thomas Jefferson, President Andrew Jackson and President Woodrow Wilson.
Thomas Jefferson on the dangers of a central bank wrote:
If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. Thomas Jefferson, President of the United States 1801-1809
Can you say corporate fascism? In my second book which was published in 1996, I warned that America was falling victim to corporate fascism. The American Heritage Dictionary defines corporate fascism as:
A philosophy or system of government that advocates or exercises dictatorship through the merging of state and business leadership.
What do you call the government backed bailout of Bear Stearns if not corporate fascism?
What do you call it when members of Congress and the President’s Administration implement national and international policy based not on legislation but on “agreements”? These “agreements” create rules and regulations that are implemented without Congressional approval. Whether it is the creation of the Transatlantic Common Market or the North American Union, the players are the same and the losers are always hard working Americans.
These “agreements” undermine national sovereignty; destroy America’s middle class and create more dependants for an ever increasing powerful central government. Meanwhile, huge American and multinational corporations reap huge financial profits while politicians have their campaign coffers filled so they can be guaranteed re-election. That is, until they decide to retire from “public service” only to be hired by the corporate titans they worked for while “serving” on Capitol Hill.Payback is a rich, former congressman making millions working in the “private sector”.
Now you understand why President Thomas Jefferson in 1816 wrote, “I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.”
President Andrew Jackson Eliminated the Central Bank
In his "Farewell Address" on March 4, 1837, President Andrew Jackson warned about the dangers of a central bank that created fiat currency. Jackson was a strong believer in the “hard assets” of gold and silver as a currency.
The Second Bank of the United States was a corporation chartered by Congress to provide a national paper currency and manage the government's finances. Like Thomas Jefferson, Jackson believed such a bank to be dangerous and unconstitutional. In 1832, he vetoed a bill to extend the Bank's charter beyond its scheduled expiration in 1836. Jackson's veto message counter posed the virtuous plain people against the Bank's privileged stockholders. The next year Jackson moved the federal government's deposits from the Bank to state-chartered banks, triggering a brief financial panic and prompting the Senate to censure him in 1834. Undeterred, Jackson launched a broader assault against all forms of government-granted privilege, especially corporate charters. His Farewell Address in 1837 warned of an insidious "money power." (see source byclick here)
·"The severe lessons of experience will, I doubt not, be sufficient to prevent Congress from again chartering such a monopoly, even if the Constitution did not present an insuperable objection to it. But you must remember, my fellow-citizens, that eternal vigilance by the people is the price of liberty, and that you must pay the price if you wish to secure the blessing. It behooves you, therefore, to be watchful in your States as well as in the Federal Government. The power which the moneyed interest can exercise, when concentrated under a single head and with our present system of currency, was sufficiently demonstrated in the struggle made by the Bank of the United States."
·"The distress and sufferings inflicted on the people by the bank are some of the fruits of that system of policy which is continually striving to enlarge the authority of the Federal Government beyond the limits fixed by the Constitution. The powers enumerated in that instrument do not confer on Congress the right to establish such a corporation as the Bank of the United States, and the evil consequences which followed may warn us of the danger of departing from the true rule of construction and of permitting temporary circumstances or the hope of better promoting the public welfare to influence in any degree our decisions upon the extent of the authority of the General Government."
·"… if you had not conquered, the Government would have passed from the hands of the many to the hands of the few, and this organized money power from its secret conclave would have dictated the choice of your highest officers and compelled you to make peace or war, as best suited their own wishes. The forms of your Government might for a time have remained, but its living spirit would have departed from it."
·"The paper system being founded on public confidence and having of itself no intrinsic value, it is liable to great and sudden fluctuations, thereby rendering property insecure and the wages of labor unsteady and uncertain. The corporations which create the paper money can not be relied upon to keep the circulating medium uniform in amount. In times of prosperity, when confidence is high, they are tempted by the prospect of gain or by the influence of those who hope to profit by it to extend their issues of paper beyond the bounds of discretion and the reasonable demands of business; and when these issues have been pushed on from day to day, until public confidence is at length shaken, then a reaction takes place, and they immediately withdraw the credits they have given, suddenly curtail their issues, and produce an unexpected and ruinous contraction of the circulating medium, which is felt by the whole community. The banks by this means save themselves, and the mischievous consequences of their imprudence or cupidity are visited upon the public."
Our growth has been rapid beyond all former example in numbers, in wealth, in knowledge, and all the useful arts which contribute to the comforts and convenience of man, and from the earliest ages of history to the present day there never have been thirteen millions of people associated in one political body who enjoyed so much freedom and happiness as the people of these United States. You have no longer any cause to fear danger from abroad; your strength and power are well known throughout the civilized world, as well as the high and gallant bearing of your sons. It is from within, among yourselves--from cupidity, from corruption, from disappointed ambition and inordinate thirst for power--that factions will be formed and liberty endangered. It is against such designs, whatever disguise the actors may assume, that you have especially to guard yourselves.
You can read President Jackson’s entire Farwell Address at this link:
President Woodrow Wilson Establishes the Federal Reserve
Sadly, President Woodrow Wilson did not read and heed the warning of President Andrew Jackson and in 1913, President Wilson signed the legislation that created the Federal Reserve. Years later, President Wilson acknowledged the harm he had brought to America.
A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is privately concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men...We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated, governments in the civilized world—no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of dominant men..
If the current financial storm turns into a tsunami the central bankers and their politicians will be either relieved of duty by angry Americans that demand a truly free, free-enterprise system or they will be entrenched with even greater power and America will have fully embraced corporate fascism.
Disclaimer: Worldview Weekend, Christian Worldview Network and its columnists do not necessarily endorse or agree with every opinion expressed in every article posted on this site. We do however, encourage a healthy and friendly debate on the issues of our day. Whether you agree or disagree, we encourage you to post your feedback by using the feedback button.
After reading all these posts, one thing has become obvious to me, the Anti- Christ will easily come to power. The anxiety level we all feel from all spectrums of the political agenda is amazing. Truly, it will be from God that he will be able to fool the left and the right. Yet, it will truly be only the Christians who will be fooled because after he enters the temple, he will reveal himself to be a liar and an enemy of Christians. We all want peace but it won't come from man. John Click here to reply to this post
Anti Christian spirit
Posted On: 03/29/08 03:06:47 PM
Age 61, MO
I think you have a misunderstanding of anti Christ. Believers will know from New Testament Scriptures that they are the temple of the Holy Spirit. The Scriptures speak of a beast that is on the rise (ever rising), that will "stand" in the "temple" and proclaim to be Christ. That beast is the anti-Christian spirit that takes over individual temples until a collective anti-Christian spirit permeates almost the entire world. Fortunately, God preserves a remnant from every generation. (See Romans 11:3-5). This could be the last generation, but we dare not give up. George Cancilla Click here to reply to this post
true
Posted On: 03/31/08 10:16:22 AM
Age 47, MO
George: Thanks for pointing that out to me. On my part, it's just one of those phrases one tosses around without thinking to denote the end times. Kinda like the words "Rapture" or "Baptism" are tossed around. The words themselves paint mental pictures dependent upon our experiences, yet my mental pictures would be different than a pre-trib adherent or a Catholic. So, anyway, thanks for keeping me straight. John Click here to reply to this post
Oil & Money
Posted On: 03/26/08 05:46:57 PM
Age 54, IN
I'm sure alot of you will that's basically
what OPEC is doing to us with oil prices!
But have you ever noticed when oil prices
jump the stock market goes tumbling? Click here to reply to this post
THE COMING ECONOMIC COLLAPSE ?
Posted On: 03/28/08 09:46:50 AM
Age 64, OH
Opec does not set the price of oil. It is set by the open market. You are correct when the price of oil has gone up the stock market goes down. Look at what happened in the 70's when opec shut off the oil to the US. But if you think $100/barrel is high you have not seen anything yet. There will be a shortage of oil in several years. The oil producers will not be able to increase production enough to keep up with the demand. This demand is going up at a alarming rate because China and India are using more and more oil. We have been spoiled by being being only a small % of the population of the earth but we use most of the earth's oil. Now "Chindia" which has a population of 2.5 billion people are building autos and highways at an amazing rate. ( China has over 100 cities of over a million people and they have more skyscrapers than we do, and over half the concrete being poured on this planet is being poured in China) This increase in the number of autos will mean the world will need more oil than it can produce. The price will probably go to over $200/barrel. This has the possibility of bringing our economy to a complete collapse. The people in this nation think that they have a right to most of the oil in the earth. Right now gasoline in about $8.00/gal. in Europe not $3.50. Gas is so CHEAP in the US because our government subsidizes the oil industry by the billions of dollars to keep the price down. Of course we pay for this in taxes. Europe has a right to complain about the US ( and does) for being such oil hogs and making the price so high. They drive cars that get 60 miles per gal. in Europe instead of driving SUV's that get 14 mi/gal. If I could afford a new car I would buy a diesel VW, I told my buddy to but one and he gets 60 miles/gal in his.- We not only have the rising price of oil but the 76 million baby boomers will start to retire very soon. They pay most of the taxes ( because they earn the high wages) and will be collecting SS instead. Put the enormous trade deficit on top of these factors and you have the makings of an economic collapse that could destroy our whole civilization. My hope is not in this nation but all my hope is in the Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus has NOT promised to keep this nation but He has promised to keep those who trust in Him and no one and nothing else. Lou Click here to reply to this post
I don't believe Ron Paul had all the answers
Posted On: 03/26/08 06:33:45 AM
Age 46, OH
I don't believe McCain does either, but I know a real kook when I see one and Hillary and Obama both qualify 100%.
I also do not believe that any politician plans to scrap the Federal Reserve Bank.
It will take a concerted effort by Americans to get the job done. We must vote out any pol who does not get it.
The sad part is we keep settling for the lesser of several evils.
We Americans must take back control of the Government by using our voting power. That means getting people to work together and I see little hope for that. We are so divided over political positions that we can't seem to get the right people elected.
We also elect people who promise the moon and deliver nothing. We can't even get people on board to support a Fair Tax!
I am not sure what it will take but like the Children of Israel, we have strayed from our roots, stopped depending on God and started depending on government. This is a very bad thing. Click here to reply to this post
pot calling the kettle black
Posted On: 03/25/08 09:33:52 PM
Age 19, AZ
Of course, the only candidate who had any chance of stopping the federal reserve system was Ron Paul. But, just like all the other media outlets you took one glancing look at a bullet point and decided you wanted the style of the huckster instead of substance. Whatever, you had your chance to promote a government accountable to their people, you guys dropped the ball. Now, I've learned that the huckster's church is teaching Rick Warren's sermons, (source, www.sliceoflaodicea.com) it's funny how much you lambast Rick Warren when Huckabee (and his church) are buddy-buddy with him. Sad. Click here to reply to this post
FEDERAL RESERVE HAS TAKEN OUR FREEDOM
Posted On: 03/25/08 01:24:38 PM
Age 64, OH
It is only common sense; that if you give someone control of your money, then you give that same person control over your life. Andrew Jackson and Abraham Lincoln both fought against the few wealthy citizens taking control of the money. But Woodrow Wilson gave the freedom of the people away to the bankers when he signed the allowed the Central Reserve to come into being. His later regret changed nothing. Lou Click here to reply to this post
Keep the wealth in the country
Posted On: 03/25/08 09:10:12 AM
Age 61, MO
A government owned banking system with sovereignty held by individual State banks would put a stop to the predatory lending of private banks. Rather than being against free markets, as one might think it is socialistic, this system would actually enhance free market capitalism; because it would curb monopoly capitalism by giving all participants an equal playing field. Multinational corporations must be broken up. All businesses must be licensed in each State in which they operate. Each State can then prohibit certain companies from obtaining licenses in their State, or revoke existing licenses if foul play is indicated. Organized or collective lobbying, grassroots or otherwise, should be outlawed. At the national level, all trade agreements must be revoked and replaced with high import tariffs. The overall goal of this or any such economic/monetary policy is to keep the wealth of the U.S. internalized. George Cancilla Click here to reply to this post
THIS truly terrifies me
Posted On: 04/01/08 12:26:33 AM
Age 47, NC
you said "Organized or collective lobbying, grassroots or otherwise, should be outlawed." you do understand that THIS is exactly what WE are CURRENTLY DOING - LOBBYING AT THE GRASSROOTS - and you want this outlawed? if WE don't stand up for what we believe in and work to have others stand up with us then we have stuff like prayer removed from schools, the ten commandments removed from anywhere, abortion on demand, homosexual teachings in school, homeschooling outlawed, etc. oh wait that's EXACTLY where we're at and to top it off now they want to make teaching and preaching from the bible "hate speech". we ARE grassroots and we ARE lobbying, even if only to other believers, to stand up and vote the way God wants us to vote AND to contact our duly elected congressional representatives on how we want them to represent us or to voice our displeasure at how they vote. no we do NOt want to outlaw grassroots lobbying. Click here to reply to this post
Yes, Christians do need to wake up
Posted On: 03/25/08 08:17:04 AM
Age 47, MO
Yes, Christians do need to wake up and we should have rallied behind the only presidential candidate running that has been pointing out these truths about the Federal Reserve and corporate fascism for thirty years. Ron Paul: Christian, pro-life, faithfully married to the same woman for over fifty years. But, instead, evangelicals fell for the socialist Huckabee who would have just continued the same old policies that have brought our nation to the brink of disaster. Click here to reply to this post
Ron Paul
Posted On: 03/25/08 11:40:22 AM
Age 46, IL
Ron Paul could have gotten traction if he did not turn out to be a kook. As soon as he blamed the US for islamic terrorism instead of blaming the terrorists he showed he was a kook and all rational people could not consider him presidential material no matter if all his other views were dead on.
I liked Ron Paul and agreed with him on many things. But he is a kook and not fit to be president. Click here to reply to this post
Ron Paul is not a kook
Posted On: 03/25/08 04:53:42 PM
Age 65, WI
I wouldn't be in such a hurry to call Ron Paul a kook. If he is a kook, I'd like more kooks like him around. While he may not have all the right answers I'm not so sure he's that far off on the Islamic hatred of us. Obviouly their religion plays a big part in what's happening, but put yourself in their place. If a foreign government was always sticking their nose in our affairs, how would you feel? George Washington warned us about sticking our nose in foreign affairs. I think George new what he was talking about. We've been sticking our noses in foreign affairs far too long and it contiues today. To spurn Ron Paul for this and call him a kook only shows ignorance of what this man has tried to do to save America over the years. That's being pretty short sighted.
I'd say it's sad that many Christians don't understand what George W. Bush and his policies are doing. Our freedoms are fast vanishing. Wise men like Ron Paul understand this and see it, but I think many Christians are being fooled from their lack of knowledge. No, Ron Paul is not a kook. The uninformed and the gullible and those who believe the propaganda in my estimation, and are the ones who have been led to believe that Ron is a kook.
The neocons now in charge of our government (followers of Strauss and Trotsky) are not opposed to lies or propaganda for what they perceive as the greater good(or to enhance their power). Much like when Mc Carthy was outing the communists, they ridiculed and made fun of Ron Paul. Guess what. Recent finding show that Mc Carthy was right.
Well, the only real threat to the neocon power came from Ron Paul. That's why they want you to think he is a kook. I wonder if the writer I am responding to has been deceived or does he undertand that Ron Paul is a threat to the neocon dynasty? That's the question I have. Click here to reply to this post
Actually...
Posted On: 03/25/08 04:49:04 PM
Age 20, MD
He didn't necessary blame the US for Islamic terrorism. He blamed the bad US leaders and their policy makers for being so domineering over the Muslims and their politics. He gave an example about how would we feel if the Chinese came to our country and built 13 bases in our country because they knew how to manage our oil better than we could. That would make every single one of us so mad we would fight back and chase them off our land even if it costs our lives. Get the point? Click here to reply to this post
Better Banking
Posted On: 03/25/08 08:05:36 AM
Age 61, MO
The Federal Reserve Bank (a private corporation) was created out of the Federal Reserve Act in 1913. This Act was an unconstitutional piece of legislation engineered for the purpose of allowing big international banking cartels to manipulate the American economy. It has been a criminal enterprise from its conception, and every Congressman from that time forward has been aware of its illegality. Precious few of those representatives have stepped forward to speak the truth about it. The creation of monies to be used by citizens of a nation should be the responsibility ONLY of the government of that nation: as it was so designated in the Constitution for the U.S., where it was further designated that such monies would be gold or silver. The banking system in the U.S. should be controlled by the federal government with each State bank operating independently to issue money. This system would do away with privately owned banks, which in turn would severely curb capital flight. State banks would be authorized to monetize the production of real goods and services, creating supply and demand at the same time. There is substantial precedent for this approach, stretching as far back as the early American colonies: In the early eighteenth century, the colony of Pennsylvania issued money that was both lent and spent by the local government into the economy, producing an unprecedented period of prosperity. This was done not only without producing price inflation but without taxing the people. The crime of fractional reserve banking would be eliminated; and there would be no credit cards of any kind. George Cancilla Click here to reply to this post