The Problem with "God is My Girlfriend" Type Songs
Posted: 03/18/2008
The Problem with "God is My Girlfriend" Type Songs
A Mighty Fortress" is one of the great hymns of the church. The melody is powerful, passionate and moving; the lyric, thorougly biblical; the message, timeless; and unashamedly theocentric. Why isn't the CCMI (Contemporary Christian Music Industry) today taking a lesson from the great masters like Luther, Watts, Wesley, etc. and writing songs that are God-conceived (doctrine), Christ-centered (worship) and Spirit-controlled (holiness)? What is the latest trend being churned out today "ad nausea" in CCMI? Read on to find out.
Past secular hits are currently being sung to represent our Lord Jesus Christ; and they are nothing more than “God as my girlfriend songs.” Some examples are: “Bridge Over Troubled Waters”; “Free Ride”; “Love is the Answer”; “You Raise Me Up”; “Love Lifted Us Up Where We Belong”; “If I Ever Lose My Faith In You”; “Maybe I’m Amazed”; “Because You Loved Me”; “Everlasting Love”; “In The Air Tonight”; “I Want to Know What Love Is”; “I Believe I Can Fly”; etc. Parroting what one Christian radio network likes to say, "Boring, for the whole family." Taking past secular hits and changing the original meaning of the song to now make it seem as if they're about Jesus because a Christian happens to be singing it is ludicrous. It not only violates the "original intent" of the meaning of the song by its author; but it is just as foolish as if some CCM artist recorded a remake of the great Beatles classic, "Hey Jude", and then tried to spiritually justify it by saying it is about the little epistle before the book of Revelation. Could you imagine if some secular artist took "Amazing Grace" and said it was about a female seductress? The Christian community would be up in arms... and rightly so. But why is Christian radio and the CBA (Christian Booksellers Assoc.) so accepting of these poorly done "covers" of classic pop hits passed off as legitimate representations of Christianity? I am convinced that this is CCM's failed attempt at "Sister Act Three" - artists superimposing a religious meaning to a secular lyric that was never intended in the first place to appeal to people in making the faith more acceptable.
The Bible never suggests, implies or condones that the redeemed people of God are to sing an old song of the world to the Lord as an act of worship with the only justification is that we simply "say" it is about God. A praise team at a local church in Nashville used for a while "I Want To Hold Your Hand" as a worship chorus (I heard this when visiting the church one Sunday). The Bible commands us, beloved, to sing "a new song to the Lord."“Let the redeemed of the Lord say so… (Psalm 107:2a).
Here are some of the references in the Word of God to sing "a new song" to the Lord:
1. Psalm 33:3, Sing to Him a new song; play skillfully on the strings, with loud shouts.
2. Psalm 40:3, He put a new song in my mouth, a song of praise to our God. Many will see and fear, and put their trust in the LORD.
3. Psalm 96:1, [Worship in the Splendor of Holiness] Oh sing to the LORD a new song; sing to the LORD, all the earth!
4. Psalm 98:1, [Make a Joyful Noise to the LORD] A Psalm. Oh sing to the LORD a new song, for he has done marvelous things! His right hand and his holy arm have worked salvation for him.
5. Psalm 144:9, I will sing a new song to you, O God; upon a ten-stringed harp I will play to you,
6. Psalm 149:1, [Sing to the LORD a New Song] Praise the LORD! Sing to the LORD a new song, his praise in the assembly of the godly!
7. Isaiah 42:10, [Sing to the LORD a New Song] Sing to the LORD a new song, His praise from the end of the earth, you who go down to the sea, and all that fills it, the coastlands and their inhabitants.
8. Revelation 5:9, And they sang a new song, saying, "Worthy are you to take the scroll and to open its seals, for you were slain, and by your blood you ransomed people for God from every tribe and language and people and nation,
9. Revelation 14:3, and they were singing a new song before the throne and before the four living creatures and before the elders. No one could learn that song except the 144,000 who had been redeemed from the earth.
The Greek word for new is “kainos”; in the LXX it is associated more with the subject of music than any other in Scripture. “New” here doesn’t mean new in style (country, rap, rock, classical, jazz, pop, etc.); it means new in nature, quality, kind or character. The new music of the redeemed people of God should distinctively be new in content, intent, purpose and function. We are new creations in Him and therefore what we sing in worship to the Lord and speak to one another in "psalms, hymns and spiritual songs" should reflect our new lives in Christ and more importantly, the Lord of our new lives--Jesus Christ the Righteous. This word "kainos" is also used to speak of "A new commandment" in john 13:34: "a new creature" in 2 Cor. 5:17; and "a new covenant," in Hebrews 8:13. As a result of being born again in Christ, we are completely new nature... new creations. This is how dramatic the change is for our music in the Lord as well. Singing "a new song" flows from the life of God's regenerated people and should evidence that newness we have in Him.
What makes music Christianly? A few brief things I'd like to mention (with more to follow in a follow up article). It must speak first and foremost about the Lord (Ex. 15:2); has as its theme the Word of God (Psalm 119:54); finds its highest expression in worship and praise (Psalm 98) bring glory to God (Psalm 103); exalt Christ (Rev. 5:9-14); is rooted in Scritpure (Col. 3:16-17); and comes from a Spirit-filled holy life (Amos 5:21-24;Eph. 5:17-21).
If Scripture speaks to all of life, then our music may too. But, it must be from a distinctive biblical worldview. When a Christian writes a love song, it should be different than say what Elton John would be singing about (for obvious reasons). Song of Solomon and Esther are two great illustrations here: both books never mention the name of the Lord; but one speaks undeniably of His love expressed in the physical union between a husband and a wife; and the other speaks of God's sovereign moving within the political realm of a nation.
Music, by divine design, is a powerful medium. No one ever buys a commentary, book, or magazine and commits the entire thing to memory, do they? But with a song, if it is well crafted, within a few listens it will be in your heart and mind permanently. You don’t even have to try and memorize it—it will take lodge in you. That is why, as believers in the Lord, we must be careful what kind of music content we listen to and then guard our hearts and minds in the Lord from a steady diet of messages, themes, ideologies or influences that do not come from a biblical worldview and could even lead us away from our devotion to the Lord. Strangely, I am more concerned on this point about Christian music than I am with secular. A song that represents a wrong view about the character of God, His gospel, the nature of Christ, or distorts His Word is much more dangerous than just a song about the human condition and the depravity of man. In other words, TBN has done more harm to the cause of Christ than Jerry Springer.
It is no “accident” that the greatest passage in the Bible on the authority and veracity of Scritpure is Psalm 19:7-11, is a song. The longest chapter in the Bible that speaks of the Word of God, Psalm 119, is a song. The greatest volume of biblical truth on the character of God is the Psalms. We will even enjoy music in eternity as we sing with all the redeemed from the four corners of the world, “Worthy is the Lamb who was slain before the foundation of the world.” And we will also hear the Lord sing praise to the Father in the midst of the redeemed congregation, according to Hebrews 2:12. Can you hardly wait?
So to all of my CCM associates out there, use your talents for the Lord. Don’t be ashamed to sing a new song for Him rather than an old song of the world trying to get a crossover hit so that you can gain a wider market base and sell a few more CD’s. Listen, the world makes better music without the Lord than any CCM does--and they won't confuse you spiritually as well. But CCM artists have the privilege of doing something that secular music cannot do, sing about the Lord Jesus Christ, His gospel, His Word and make music that will erupt in praise, worship, adoration and glory to our God.
James is right, “our life is a vapor” – it comes and goes so quickly, even if we live our three score and ten and then some. In the end, may we live our vaporous lives for the Lord each day with Him in mind; doing all for His glory. If we should eat and drink to the glory of God, how much more should our music, the new song of the redeemed, be to glorify and honor Him? (And I sing for an audience of ONE.)
Disclaimer: Worldview Weekend, Christian Worldview Network and its columnists do not necessarily endorse or agree with every opinion expressed in every article posted on this site. We do however, encourage a healthy and friendly debate on the issues of our day. Whether you agree or disagree, we encourage you to post your feedback by using the feedback button.
Thank you, Steve, for contending for Christ-centered music. I have longed for the hymns I grew up singing. The theology and doctrine in the old hymns totally overshadow the shallow 'see what I can do' praise songs of today. Well, said, Steve. Click here to reply to this post
Re: God is my "girlfriend" / " boyfriend" ! ! !
Posted On: 03/29/08 06:30:36 AM
Age 56, FL
Thank you & God Bless you Steve, for this excellent article on the CCM in so many of today's Church services! I too, lament the passing away of the wonderful hymns that were once so common in our churches! They were biblically based and kept your mind/heart/spirit centered on the Lord. The biggest problem with CCM - is that it sounds No different than the secular pop/rock, etc. music of the world (1 John 2:15,16)! CCM does NOT sound like a "new song" - written & sanctified to worship/glorify our sovereign Lord & God! (And what with many of CCM's repetitious lyrics, it sounds rather like a meditation "chant" more at home in a Buddhist ceremony!) Why does a "new song" to the Lord - today - have to sound just like the worldly music - that appeals to the flesh!(Romans 8:1,5,8) As for me - I do NOT want to, nor care to be reminded of the music that I listened to, before I was saved! Should any of us? Are we not, now all - a "new creature" in Christ? (II Cor. 5:17) Click here to reply to this post
Amazing Grace
Posted On: 03/26/08 09:21:07 AM
Age 57, VA
I am an older Christian. The problem I have with the contemporary Christian music is its repetitiveness. I heard one senior pastor call it 7-11 music - the same 7 songs sung 11 times. There is a lot of theology and doctrine in the old hymns, but in order to appeal to the world, we are doing our best to dumb down Christianity. I mean, really, how many times do you have to sing "Jesus is Lord" before you finally get it? I've seen people sing this stuff with "rapturous" looks on their faces and swaying, just like I've seen pagans in undeveloped countries do before their gods. Jesus said to stay away from vain repetitions. That's want CCM is to me. Click here to reply to this post
As for the songs you mentioned...
Posted On: 03/20/08 12:52:00 PM
Age 21, NC
Is it just me, or are all the songs you mentioned except for “Love is the Answer”; and I think “If I Ever Lose My Faith In You” basically little more than poorly disguised secular songs? My concern about doing so is that there is no way to completely separate the secular song's tune and the Christianized words written to it. Also, as many of the songs you mentioned are under copyright; couldn't there be a potential legal issue as well? Click here to reply to this post
Also, about that list...
Posted On: 04/03/08 04:15:51 PM
Age 21, NC
I was a little surprised (and disappointed) to find "You Raise Me Up" was originally a secular song. Click here to reply to this post
New songs, old tunes etc..
Posted On: 03/19/08 11:19:16 PM
Age 69, TX
I mostly agree with the article, but I also remember reading that "Amazing Grace" was highly criticized when first offered. Why? It was written to the tune of a saloon song.
This being said, I have been moved by the Spirit of God through a variety of "styles" from classics to pop by way of southern Gospel, soul, gregorian chants,c&w, Irish ballads, Latin melodies etc... Any of these could appeal to the flesh if it is not infused with the Spirit of God.
A song is either anointed or it is not. Click here to reply to this post
Not Amazing Grace
Posted On: 04/02/08 10:21:11 AM
Age 34, FL
The song you are thinking of is Luther's "A Mighty Fortress Is Our God". Amazing Grace is set to a West African Sorrow Chart that invokes the notes of the Pentatonic Scale (the 5 black keys on the piano also called the "Slave Scale"). Check out Wintley Phipps on Youtube to see an amazing rendition of with the history about the writer John Newton. Click here to reply to this post
Nothing New
Posted On: 03/19/08 04:34:32 PM
Age 50, MN
This is nothing new. Popular songs have been "christianized" for centuries. The Wesleys certainly did it. You make a couple of good points but not sure we should just romanticize the old hymns when many of them were put together in the same way you describe here. Click here to reply to this post
Why don't the lyrics mean anything??
Posted On: 03/19/08 03:56:46 PM
Age 39, FL
Why is it that we are so quick to condemn so-called secular music based on the lyrics and worry about the damage these lyrics can do to our children singing about sex, drugs and murder all day - BUT when the lyrics glorify the Lord, they are meaningless if sung to a formerly secular melody line?? Seems so strange to me... Click here to reply to this post
Thanks!
Posted On: 03/19/08 02:20:19 PM
Age 46, IN
I have forwarded a link to your article to our pastor who leads music/worship. He does a pretty good job balancing the old "new" and the new "new", and I thought this article would be encouraging. I told him that I especially enjoyed the analysis of the word "new".
I spoke with an old friend recently who is part of a "WillowCreepy" church in our community. He told me that the songs they were preparing for the following Sunday "worship" were songs done by U2, Hillsong, and Linkin Park... Click here to reply to this post
The lord's Prayer
Posted On: 03/19/08 10:28:09 AM
Age 47, MO
Our Father who art in heaven, please hallow our name. Thy Kingdom come when our will be done as we build our lives together. Give us this day all we ask and fulfill all our desires. Lead us not into tribulation and deliver us from our stupidity. Thine is our kingdom, our power, and our glory forever and ever. Amen. Click here to reply to this post
Using pop tunes is not new
Posted On: 03/19/08 09:57:04 AM
Age 49, MT
Fanny Crosby was a prolific hymn writer in the 1800s. Fanny often matched her poems to familiar tunes. An example is "We Thank Thee, Our Father," sung to the already widespread "Adeste Fidelis." She set her poems to Scottish and Welsh airs and even used tunes by Stephen Foster.
William Booth, founder of the Salvation Army, used the music of popular tunes for hymns. William Booth decided that if it would attract sinners to listen to the message of salvation he would use tunes familiar to his target audience. "Why should the devil have all the best tunes?" William replied when some people objected to his use of popular tunes for his hymns.
"The absence of contrast between secular and sacred styles of music in the Middle Ages can be shown simply by the observation that a secular song, if given a set of sacred words, could serve as sacred music, and vice versa. Only recently has it been recognized how frequently such interchange took place, and the more we learn about medieval music, the more important it becomes. The practice of borrowing a song from one sphere and making it suitable for use in the other by the substitution of words is known as 'parody' or 'contrafactum.'" (Source: Manfred F. Bukofzer, 'Popular and Secular Music in England', in The New Oxford History of Music 3: Ars Nova and the Renaissance, 1300-1540, ed. Anselm Hughes and Gerald Abraham (London: Oxford University Press, 1960), p. 108.) Click here to reply to this post
Using the old tunes
Posted On: 03/19/08 04:49:48 PM
Age 45, MN
There is a huge difference from using an old tune, putting a complete set of new lyrics to it, and what Steve is talking about. The concern is that CCM artists are taking the secular song, intact, changing maybe a her/she to a him/he, to make it sound like it's talking about Jesus. Not exactly heartfelt worship, IMHO. Click here to reply to this post
Not so huge
Posted On: 03/20/08 10:13:15 AM
Age 49, MT
I accept your point, but I do not think the difference is so huge. The ONLY difference between CCM and the world's music is the lyrics (not including the spiritual issues, of course).
Music is a creation of God, and He gifts people to craft it. "Secular" artists have taken their craft and preverted it for worldly use. That is why a well-written song is so enduring. It touches the spiritual dimension. So I see nothing particularly troubling about reclaiming God's gift for the Kingdom. I don't think every secular song is eligible, but a select few are. Click here to reply to this post
Woodrow Kroll, David Jeremiah,Sean McDowell, Josh McDowell, David Barton, Carl Kerby, Frank Harber, Kerby Anderson, and the Branson Family Reunion DVD Set! This is a $74.95 value for only $34.95! FREE worksheet with purchase!
Russell O'Quinn, Steve Saint, Dr. Michael Youssef, Dr. Erwin Lutzer, Bob Lepine, Star Parker, Kirk Cameron, Ray Comfort, and the Branson Family Reunion DVD Set! This is a $74.95 value for only $34.95!