To Assimilate Or Not To Assimilate; That's The Question
Posted: 12/11/2007 To Assimilate Or Not To Assimilate; That's The Question
by Phyllis Schlafly, December 12, 2007
Are you tired of anonymous voices on the phone telling you to "Press 1 (or sometimes 2) for English"? The ability to speak and communicate in English is the litmus test of whether our immigrants are assimilating into the American culture or not.
To become a naturalized American citizen, the law states that the immigrant must demonstrate "the ability to read, write and speak ordinary English." All public opinion polls confirm by majorities approaching 90 percent that this is what the American people want.
Despite the law, the Pew Hispanic Center just reported that only 52 percent of Hispanic naturalized citizens speak English well or pretty well. Pew also reported that 28 percent of Latino immigrants speak only Spanish on the job.
Even those who seek diversity in politics, in religion, in morals, in lifestyles and in nationalities reject diversity when it comes to speaking English. It's the tie that binds; it's the e pluribus unum of our culture; it's the route to success in education, careers, and the chance to live the American dream.
As George W. Bush rounds out his second term as President, pundits will be speculating on what his legacy will be. The Census Bureau just answered that question: his legacy is admitting the staggering number of 10.3 million foreigners into the United States, both legally and illegally, plus many more illegal residents the Census Bureau could not identify.
The jury is still out on whether those 10.3 million will assimilate into the American socio-economic culture or will remain in neighborhoods where they associate only with each other and fail to communicate and compete with citizens of their adopted country.
One would think that sound government policy should encourage assimilation, but unhappily our government, both the Bill Clinton and George W. Bush administrations, is retarding assimilation.
Senator Lamar Alexander (R-TN) lifted the lid on one of the government's major campaigns to discourage assimilation when he offered an amendment to the Commerce, Justice, Science Appropriations Bill (H.R. 3093) to prohibit federal funds from being used by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to sue employers for requiring English to be spoken by employees on the job. EEOC filed over 200 such lawsuits against employers in the past year.
EEOC accuses the Salvation Army at Framingham, Mass., of discriminating against two employees "on the basis of their national origin." The charge is ridiculous because the Salvation Army actually hired the two employees and gave them a year to learn enough English to speak it on the job, which they failed to do.
Since Alexander's amendment reflected extraordinary bipartisan congressional common sense, it passed the Senate 75-19. The amendment was approved by the House 218-186, and headed for the conference committee.
Then the Hispanic caucus had a tantrum, threatened to block passage of every bill until the amendment was removed, and blocked debate on a popular revision to the unpopular Alternative Minimum Tax. Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) trotted out inflammatory accusations of "bigotry and prejudice."
Hispanic Caucus Chair Rep. Joe Baca (D-CA) yelled that "There ain't going to be a bill" with the Alexander language. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) halted all action on appropriations to fund the FBI, NASA and the Justice Department.
Our government also discourages assimilation by printing foreign language ballots, even though only U.S. citizens are supposed to vote. Another way that government programs retard assimilation is by forcing children with Hispanic-sounding names into Spanish-language classes in public schools, often over the opposition of their parents.
One of the most objectionable anti-assimilation policies is Clinton's Executive Order 13166 (PDF), which requires all recipients of federal funds to provide all information and services in any language requested by any recipient of federal funds (such as a private-practice physician who accepts a Medicare or Medicaid patient). Despite the unnecessary costs and unpopularity of this unilateral Clinton action, the Bush Administration has continued the policy.
All Republican presidential candidates affirmed in the televised debate from New Hampshire on June 5, under questioning by Wolf Blitzer, that English should be "the official language of the United States." Only John McCain offered a muddled modification about Native Americans using their own languages.
That's why it's unfortunate that the Republican candidates agreed to participate in a Spanish-language debate sponsored by the Spanish-language television channel Univision.
Memo to Republican Presidential candidates: English language is as valuable an issue for you as driver's licenses for illegal aliens, an issue that forced New York Governor Eliot Spitzer and candidate Hillary Clinton to reverse themselves. Go for it, and leave Pelosi and Reid scrambling to deal with the divisions in their own Party.
Disclaimer: Worldview Weekend, Christian Worldview Network and its columnists do not necessarily endorse or agree with every opinion expressed in every article posted on this site. We do however, encourage a healthy and friendly debate on the issues of our day. Whether you agree or disagree, we encourage you to post your feedback by using the feedback button.
English literacy requirement
as a component in the naturalization of aliens within the United States. Surprisingly, such a requirement has existed in statutory form for less than 100 years, having first been enacted in 1906.
Currently, federal law (8 U.S.C. Section 1423) provides that:
(a) No person except as otherwise provided in this subchapter shall hereafter be naturalized as a citizen of the United States upon his own application who cannot demonstrate — an understanding of the English language, including an ability to read, write, and speak words in ordinary usage in the English language: Click here to reply to this post
Aren't you all immigrants?
Posted On: 12/12/07 01:40:20 PM
Age 44, ENGLAND
Am I missing something, or is not nearly every American an immigrant or the descendant of immigrants? I doubt you'd all want to learn Navajo, so what's the problem? Click here to reply to this post
A tired argument
Posted On: 12/14/07 02:55:06 PM
Age 56, NE
NO we are not all immigrants! I was born in the USA. I am a native American, not what used to be known as an Indian, but I was born here. What does that make me? The issue here is that we are being forced to change our culture and heritage by those who refuse to assimilate. We aren't racist or hateful for wanting to keep our national identity. It isn't asking too much for others to learn our language if they wish to be a part of our nation. That's assuming they are here legally. I have a good friend who went through the process to become a citizen. She is of Chinese ancestry and comes from Malaysia. She doesn't expect to have an option of pushing a number to hear Chinese. She knew when she came to America, and chose to do so legally, that she would have to learn English. If I travel to a foreign country I don't expect everyone to have to provide anything in English for me. Our so called leaders are bringing about the destruction of our nation and making us feel guilty about it in the bargain. If you want to see where we're heading take a look at France. Paris seems to be in flames about every other week because of immigrants who refuse to assimilate and demand to have things there way. Click here to reply to this post
Technically speaking...
Posted On: 12/13/07 09:22:33 PM
Age 28, TX
Everyone everywhere is an immigrant or descendant thereof, because we all emigrated from the Garden of Eden...--Mrs. Pilgrim Click here to reply to this post
Re: Aren't you all immigrants?
Posted On: 12/13/07 07:11:47 PM
Age 56, OK
What does speaking Navajo have to do with this immigrant subject? Just curious what your point is? Click here to reply to this post
The Hip Pocket Reality
Posted On: 12/12/07 12:18:33 PM
Age 56, OK
Have you ever considered how much they charge us for having to put these recordings for spanish on their service, along with having to hire spanish speaking people? Another point is, the people they exclusively are catering to and charging us out the whazoo for, well the people are illegals!!! No one has ever, as far as I know ever reported how much, say my phone bill went up to pay for this illegal service to illegals. Not to mention the extra charged for an item because of all the product advertisement. I am really curious to know how much they are taking out of my hip pocket, so they can cater to illegals. Click here to reply to this post
What do we do about English
Posted On: 12/12/07 09:37:25 AM
Age 41, CA
I agree that immigrants should be made to learn and speak English. We are the only country in the world that is not requiring immigrants and those who want to become citizens to learn the official language of the country. Other countries would laugh at us going there and trying to become a citizen (or even living there) without learning The Official Language. My greatgrandparents had to learn English when they arrived from their different countries, as did everyone else's ancestors when they arrived. I don't think legal documents ( voting ballots, government records & papers, etc) should be in any spanish but English only since you are supposed to be a citizen to vote and since people are supposed to know English in order to become a citizen. Putting the ballots, etc. in spanish doesn't make ANY sense is completely defeats the purpose of them learning the English language and becoming a Citizen of The US. Employers should be able to tell employees that English is mandatory on a job since it it Their Business. What can we do about it when we as "poorer" citizens do not have the money to fight these things as those gathering together to get the spanish vote do? I will take any suggestions as my family would love to see this stopped so honor is given back to our ancestors for their fight and struggle to come here and do WHATEVER was necessary to become citizens. Also giving honor back to our country, instead of honoring every other country but ours. Click here to reply to this post
What's wrong with multi-language?
Posted On: 12/12/07 09:26:36 AM
Age 12, SINGAPORE
Hi,
I'm not a American, but an Singaporean, Chinese. I don't know what's exactly happening over there, but this is my personal opinion, according to what I learnt from this article.
In Singapore, English is also our main language. But for messages by our grassroots (banners, newsletters, letters, forms etc.), you can see the same message or text in four languages (English, Chinese, Malay, Tamil) And so far, I haven't heard our government said something like: "To cut costs, let's print all texts in English only. After all, our main language is English!"
Just my point of view. Click here to reply to this post
RE: What's wrong with multi-language
Posted On: 12/13/07 09:26:37 PM
Age 28, TX
You have a good point. However, the language in these parts has historically been English. It's only been in very recent years that people have started insisting that it's either unnecessary or impossible to learn English.--Mrs. Pilgrim Click here to reply to this post