|
|
| Is Our Tax Code Biblical? |
Posted: 04/16/2007
Is America’s Tax Code Biblical? By Brannon S. Howse
The following is an excerpt from Brannon’s new book, Put Your Beliefs To The Test, 82 Questions That Reveal Whether You Think Like A Christian or Modern-Day Liberal, which will be released October 29th. Order your personally signed copy now at: http://www.worldviewweekend.com/secure/store/product.php?ProductID=265
True or False: The most Biblically based tax system would be one built on a flat tax where everyone pays the same percentage of their income in taxes.
The Humanist Manifestos call for punishing wealthy people by requiring them to pay a higher tax rate. Although the Bible teaches that we are not to covet, when the government takes from the rich through a punitive tax system, it is not only discouraging work but is coveting—and acquiring—money to which it has no ethically legitimate claim.
Humanists generally want to redistribute wealth through some form of socialism, but their goal is not even possible. While money can be redistributed, redistribution can never provide enough money to make everyone wealthy. When the government attempts to take from the rich to give to the “poor,” they really are taking capital from businesspeople who then are unable to expand their companies, start new companies, and create additional jobs which energize the economy. They are also less able to consume products themselves.
When fewer goods and services are purchased, people at all income levels suffer. If new cars remain on the sales lot, for instance, jobs are lost from the factory assembly line down to the car dealer. When home sales slump, wages disappear for the builder, the mortgage banker, realtor, home inspector, carpenter, concrete company, bricklayers, roofing company, landscaper, carpet layer, and movers. It is a fallacy to think the government can take by force from those with wealth in order to benefit the economy.
Consider another angle on the taxation issue as well. The Lord only asks for a 10% tithe of what we earn. I submit that if God requests only 10% of our income for His work, the government has no need of 50% or more. The combination of federal taxes, state tax, sales taxes, tolls, airline tax, car tax, property tax, gasoline tax, et al, is far more than 50% if you earn an average income. However, most Americans do not recognize how much they pay in taxes because many are “hidden taxes”—meaning people pay them without recognizing them as taxes (such as an amount figured into the purchase price of a product).
Notice, too, that God did not set up a progressive tithing system where the more you make, the larger the percentage you tithe. David Barton offers this observation from Scripture:
The current income tax structure in the United States mandates a higher tax rate or percentage the more a person makes. This tax system is contradicted by scripture, especially Exodus 30:11-15, which provided a “half a shekel” tax for everyone numbered. Verse 15 states: “The rich shall not give more and the poor shall not give less than half a shekel.” In addition, the Biblical tithe is not applied progressively, rather it is applied equally to everyone (“And all the tithe of the land, whether of the seed of the land or of the fruit of the tree, is the Lord’s. It is holy to the Lord.…And concerning the tithe of the herd or the flock, of whatever passes under the rod, the tenth one shall be holy to the Lord.” Lev. 27:30,32).
Scripture commands everyone to tithe 10% of their income. So why should the government not follow this example? Since civil government was created by God, it makes sense that the tax system should reflect God’s standards. That’s far from what we see in our current system, of course. In 1960, the average taxpayer worked 36 days to pay all of his or her taxes, but by 2003, it took 189 days. That means American taxpayers now work half the year just to pay their taxes.
Many Christians defend the government’s unBiblical tax policies by citing Jesus’ words that we should render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s. The question arises, though, “what is Caesar’s?” Is Caesar entitled to 50% of what you earn? That’s certainly questionable. In addition, Jesus Christ was speaking of the Roman Empire. In America, we are Caesar in that we are a government of the people, by the people, and for the people.
Not only is a progressive income tax being unBiblical, so is the capital gains tax, as described by author, historian, and Worldview Weekend speaker, David Barton:
The capital gains tax, which is a tax on profits, actually penalizes a person for success (i.e., the more profit a person makes, the higher the tax rate they pay; profit/windfall of an initial investment) the more profit you make, the more you have to pay. However, in the Bible, the more profit you make, the more you are rewarded. Both the parable of the talents (Matthew 25:14-30) and the parable of the minas (Luke 19:12-27) conflict with the notion of a tax on capital gains. “For to everyone who has, more will be given, and he will have abundance; but from him who does not have, even what he has will be taken away.” In other words, the Bible implies that those who do well (invest) with what they have will be given more.
The Bible even speaks about how the hourly minimum wage law is a violation of the Biblical principle of private contract. David Barton explains:
The parable of the landowner and laborers (Matt 20:1-16) is applicable to the employer/employee relationship and the issue of wages. The landowner hires workers at different times of the day and yet pays each worker the same amount at the end of the day. When the workers hired first complain, the landowner replies, “Did you not agree with me for a denarius? Take what is yours and go your way. I wish to give to this last man the same as to you. Is it not lawful for me to do what I wish with my own things? (“things” is translated as “money” in some versions)” There is an implication that the landowner had a right to determine the wages his workers received, as well as an implication that the workers could accept or reject the landowner’s offer of work. James 5:4 provides a balance in that the Lord hears the cries of the laborers who are cheated out of wages they are due.
John Stossel, author and anchor of ABC News program 20/20, notes in his book Myths, Lies and Downright Stupidity how the minimum wage law actually hurts the low-income workers it purports to help:
Just as price controls discourage production, wage controls discourage hiring. The poorest workers are hurt most. When you fix wages above the market rate, the rate freely set by the give-and-take of supply and demand, you temporarily help experienced workers by giving them an artificial raise. But you also take away all incentive to hire an “entry-level” worker.
Stossel goes on to point out how few Americans actually earn minimum wage:
Russell Roberts, an economics professor at George Mason University, makes it a practice when he gives lectures to “educated” groups to ask them what proportion of the workforce earns the minimum wage. These are congressional staffers, law professors, and journalists. The typical answer is 20 percent of the workforce. The correct answer is less than 3 percent. “It’s always a good reality check for people,” he says. “People need to realize that competition for workers keeps wages up, not legislation.
Another angle on Biblical taxation principles relates to inheritance. What parents do not want to leave both a spiritual inheritance and a financial inheritance to their children and grandchildren? However, thanks to our government and its unBiblical inheritance tax, also known as the “death tax,” it is becoming increasingly difficult to leave a financial inheritance to children and grandchildren. Note well what the Bible says about leaving an inheritance and how our federal government is violating this Biblical principle:
The Bible speaks to the issue of inheritance numerous times. Proverbs 13:22 states “A good man leaves an inheritance to his children’s children” (something that is not likely with the current estate tax which can take up to 55% of an estate, leaving 45% to the children; when the children pass it on to the grandchildren, up to 55% of the remaining 45% can be taken, leaving only 27% of the original that would be passed on to the “children’s children”). Ezekiel 46:18 states that “the prince shall not take any of the people’s inheritance by evicting them from their property; he shall provide an inheritance for his sons from his own property, so that none of My people may be scattered from his property.” Other scriptures that deal with inheritance are Proverbs 19:14, I Chronicles 28:8, and Ezra 9:12.
Further, it is a myth that the wealthy do not pay their share. A 2003 study reveals that 80% of taxes were paid by just 20% of Americans. In fact, here’s how various income levels contribute to the tax collections in the United States:
• The top 5% pay 53% of all income taxes;
• The top 10% pay 65%;
• The top 25% pay 83%;
• The top 50% pay 96%;
• The bottom 50% pays a mere 4% of all income taxes.
That is to say that the top 1% pays more than ten times the federal income tax as the bottom 50%! But note this:
• The top 1% earns only 17.5% of all income;
• The top 5% earns 32%;
• The top 10% earns 43%;
• The top 25% earns 65%;
•The top 50% earns 86% of the income.
If you compare the breakdowns of taxes and incomes, you’ll see that the higher income brackets pay far more than their share of taxes—in some cases, three times as much. If the tax structure were “flattened,” they would still pay more tax than lower income people, but the burden would be fairly distributed.
The following is an excerpt from Brannon’s new book, Put Your Beliefs To The Test, 82 Questions That Reveal Whether You Think Like A Christian or Modern-Day Liberal, which will be released October 29th. Order your personally signed copy now at: http://www.worldviewweekend.com/secure/store/product.php?ProductID=265
Distributed by www.ChristianWorldviewNetwork.com
Read and post feedback
Disclaimer: Worldview Weekend, Christian Worldview Network and its columnists do not necessarily endorse or agree with every opinion expressed in every article posted on this site. We do however, encourage a healthy and friendly debate on the issues of our day. Whether you agree or disagree, we encourage you to post your feedback by using the feedback button.
2364 Views
Printer Friendly Version |
E-mail this article to a friend |
Return to home

|
Re: Is Our Tax Code Biblical?
| Posted On: 07/04/07 09:01:43 PM |
Age 53, IA |
The author forgets what the tithe was for: the Levite, the widow, the poor, and the stranger among us.
Another writer got it right - the 10% is a starting point.
The tithe also only applied to those who made their living from the land.
The poor were not required to tithe, but rather received a part of the tithe.
Is the flat tax a fair tax?
I would submit to you it is not. Consider the widow's gift. Jesus said she gave more than they all because it was what she had to live on. I find it rather appalling that most preachers hold this up as an example of how to give without expecting others to impoverish themselves to the same level as the widow, but expect the poor to become even poorer by taxing them at the same rate as the wealthy.
Our government is based on Biblical principles. In the 1960s and 1970s, homelessness was increasing. There was no safety net, and the churches were either unable or unwilling to help them.
It seems to me that God made sure the Biblical pattern continued to be followed with the institution of our current tax law.
Click here to reply to this post
|
Re: Is Our Tax Code Biblical?
| Posted On: 04/26/07 11:52:38 AM |
Age 26, IN |
The conclusions would be good if the premise was correct. However, Socratic logic does not allow for argumentation from the conclusion. So let's look at the premise. Mr. Howse argues that there should be a flat-tax because it benefits those like him (well-to-do white males). He says that God only asks for 10% to bolster this position (arguing from the conclusion). Instead of looking for ways to bolster the opinion, however, Mr. Howse should be looking at Scripture to form his conclusion. A thorough look at Scripture would show us that God's requirement of 10% is not a LIMIT, but rather, a STARTING POINT. In fact, the apostle Paul tells men that they ought to purpose in their heart what they will give..."each according to what they have." Well let's do some math. How much is 10% of 100,000? It's 10,000, leaving the person with a 90,000 salary. Great for that person who makes six figures. How much is 10% of 15,000? It's 1500, leaving the person with 13,500. Wow, big difference, huh? Apply the logic with a flat tax and put it in context. A family of four will live very comfortably with 90,000 in their pocket (Or even 50,000 after governmental taxes), but a single mother trying to make ends meet on a salary under 10,000 (after tithing and a flat-rate tax) would not survive. Mr. Howse would like you to feel sorry for the businesses and how those poor rich people would be able to afford less raw material and product. Good rhetoric, because it fools the masses, who never hear the other side of the story. In a flat-tax system, what happens at one end affects the other end. If the tax benefits the rich, you can bet it hurts the poor. Personally, I wouldn't mind a few rich people having less, if it benefits the poor. It's interesting how much Scripture gets thrown about to the exclusion of other passages like those in Nahum and James where the point is hammered home that it is the RESPONSIBILITY of the rich to take care of the poor. NOT AN OPTION. I don't see a lot of that going on, even in the church. For the record, I think that the command from Paul to give according to what you have means those who have more are supposed to give a higher percentage.
Click here to reply to this post
|
Re: Is Our Tax Code Biblical?
| Posted On: 04/19/07 01:39:27 AM |
Age 54, OK |
Interesting considerations. Certainly there is value for the society who follows the Creator's plan. But what is more interesting is how often believers try to impose biblical matters upon America as though it is something other than it actually is: a gentile nation. And when the times of the gentiles is fulfilled America shall fall along with all the others.
There are only two kinds of nations: Israel and the gentile nations. There is no nation like Israel. It is the only theocracy. And if our eschatology is wrong our expectations for America will err. Prayer, humitlity and repentence is good, but the Church was never promised a land that might be healed (II Chron 7:14).
As for tithing, Israel was obligated to at least two tithes, and there is discussion about a third tithe every three years. That makes 23.33%. And then there were offerrings. There is no magic in 10%, and it is not even commanded of the Church.
Confusing that which belongs to Israel with that which belongs to the Church is one of the most serious errors believers make today, right up there with failing to properly understand the sovereignty of God.
Click here to reply to this post
|

Re: Is Our Tax Code Biblical?
| Posted On: 04/18/07 10:11:18 PM |
Age 52, IN |
The article did not clearly answer the question: "True or False: The most Biblically based tax system would be one built on a flat tax where everyone pays the same percentage of their income in taxes."
Rather than debate whether the current progressive income tax code is Biblical, why not ask whether any type of income tax is Biblical? If the IRS can take a portion of your earnings, has it not taken the time you worked to earn it and made you a part-time slave? Assuming the answer cannot be anything but yes, then collection of any income tax is a violation of the 13th Amendment prohibition of involuntary servitude.
Today's income tax is essentially a lite version of pre-1865, inter-generational slavery, with the primary difference being it is now imposed only upon everyone who is a producer.
Click here to reply to this post
|
- Re: Re: Is Our Tax Code Biblical?
| Posted On: 04/19/07 08:30:14 AM | | Age 50, WI | I agree, from what I have been told plus a video which was presented to me on this topic, explained that the "income tax" that we are told we must pay is unconstitutional. Evangilist "Mr. Dino," is in jail for not paying taxes and nobody is talking about it. This man may be a bit rough around the edges in how he talks but he loves the Lord and gave up his comfort zone to preach the Word and educate people on the subject of Creation vs Evolution. I am not saying we shouldn't pay taxes at all, but it shouldn't be as it is today.
God Bless! Click here to reply to this post
Re: Is Our Tax Code Biblical?
| Posted On: 04/18/07 03:31:35 PM |
Age 63, OH |
Not only are income taxes unconstitutional but property taxes are unconstitutional. How can the government tax something that is mine. There is no such thing as private property in this nation for we only rent from the government. If you do not pay your property tax you will find out who owns it. There is judgment coming on this nation for all the homes that have been stolen from poor widows by the government. And the church watched and did nothing. Read the scriptures and see what God thinks of this action. James says that this is pure religion, that we take care of widows and orphans. Christians gave up this God given right of their land without much resistance. And now with school shootings I hear more Christians wanting to put their trust in men instead of God by giving up more God given rights. Lou
Click here to reply to this post
|

Re: Is Our Tax Code Biblical?
| Posted On: 04/18/07 12:46:25 PM |
Age 39, MI |
I agree with the article I am not here to argue for or against our tax code being biblical. Lets be honest do we as Christians actually expect it to be? But lets take the real hard look at who we are first before we point the finger elsewhere. I understand that most Christians only tithe 1-2% of their income. If each of us really took God at His word wouldn't we tithe 10%. We as the disciples of Christ are to do what He commands us without a complaint. Here is the real question. We know God is in control, do we as Christians actually have a right to complain? I believe if we tithed as we are commanded to then the church would have more than enough money to help those in need and the government might just lower taxes, because those who used to go to the governement for help have found the real help the church.
Click here to reply to this post
|
- Re: Re: Is Our Tax Code Biblical?
| Posted On: 04/19/07 09:05:30 AM | | Age 63, OH | Brother you make a very good point. We are the ones who should help the poor not the government. But when a family is paying out over 50 percent of what they make to the government it is hard to give to the poor. I would also like to add that Abraham tithed under a higher law as Paul says. Tithing under the law is better than not giving to God at all. But it falls far short of the higher law of love which Abraham gave under. Abraham gave directly to God Himself not to a church, and he gave out of love not duty. How does anyone know how much Christians tithe. First of all, who are the real Christians. I used to tithe by check to my church until a friend came to me and said he was amazed by the amount I gave. I was shocked and asked him how did he know. He confessed that the book was left out and he seen I was one of the top givers in the church. I was angry about this leaving the book out and prayed about it. The Lord told me to be obedient and not let the right hand know what the left hand is doing. I started giving in cash instead, and being very careful to see that no one seen my giving and made it in several amounts so that it would not be noticed. I was amazed at the results and also made sad. The leaders of the church started treating me very different and I have been on their black list ever since. I left that church for other reasons, for their following men and not God. But no one knows what I give to God except Him, for I do not know myself what I give for I do not keep track. Lou Click here to reply to this post
- Re: Re: Re: Is Our Tax Code Biblical?
| Posted On: 07/04/07 09:15:54 PM | | Age 53, IA | Scripture only records that Abraham tithed the one time.
There is no command given here; it was voluntary.
None of it was was from Abraham's possessions.
It was from Lot's and Sodom's recovered booty.
Abraham kept nothing for himself.
As one wise man pointed out, if we are to follow Abraham's example, we would have to wait til our neighbor's house was robbed, go after the thief, and tithe of our neighbor's recovered goods. Click here to reply to this post
Re: Is Our Tax Code Biblical?
| Posted On: 04/18/07 01:08:26 AM |
Age 62, FL |
I agree with the principlas of the article - they are correct - however they ALL refer to dictatorships and Monarchies (Empires).
America was established by our Founders as a NO-TAX NATION. They had just escaped from Europe for this reaosn and for the freedom of Religion.
Our Constituion forbids ANY income or direct taxes on the people ! Also land/property taxes are UN-Constitutional ! And the land was to be only owned by American citizens, NOT government or Foreigners !
And we pay more DAILY taxes than you realize because EVERYTHING IN THIS NATION IS A TAX NOW that we need just to get from one day to the next: licenses, permits, registrations, sales taxes, etc - those are ALL Constitutionally forbidden direct taxes on the people !
THE roads and highways belong Constitutionally TO THE American PEOPLE, yet we have toll roads and bridges and need a "license" in order to drive on road that WE OWN ! WE are told that use of the roads is a "privledge" as if the government owns them - but that is NOT what our Founders set up here ! Driving is NOT a "privledge" it is a RIGHT ! IT should NEED NO LICENSE,REGISTRATION, permit, etc. to drive, own & carry a gun, or own a vehicle or build or repair our homes ! Those are all TAXES ! So is the speeding ticket you get ! That is a tax also. We are faced with taxes with every breath we take !
WE are NOT in a "free" country as we have been brainwashed into believing !
Services should NOT be taxed ! IT should only be between the employer and employee - Government has no business poking its nose into every trasaction , phone bill, cable bill, anything we purchase or do, or anything !
Government was origianlly designed to PROTECT OUR RIGHTS, not take them away and then rent them to us as their "Privleges" !
That is fraud ! That is what dictators do to their people, not a 'free' nation !
To BE a governmnet of, by, for the PEOPLE - the People are not made into slaves who are in FEAR of the government, as we have it here in this nation ! The People would NOT be taxing themselves into the poor house if this were a real government of the PEOPLE ! They would not be havigng coronaries over a day of the year (Ap 15th) because the "government" is ready to send out their ax-men to seize your head because they demand money from you - just like the mob boss does !
The Federal Reserve is not Constitutional either and is not even American ! Those are Foriegn bankers and big business men !In fact the entire Federal Corporate US "government " is nothing more than a Foreign entity Corporation and NOT a real 'government' at all ! It hasn't been OFFICIALLY more than a Corporation since 1913 when the "Leaders" stole all the money from the American people and replaced it with worthless paper Federal Reserve notes that are not worth the paper they are printed on !
ALL UN-CONTITUTIONAL !!! Every bit of it along with all the taxes !
All part of the One World Governmnent Plan !
And we are in it !
The only taxes Constitutionally allowed are excise and import taxes !
Adn even in teh Corporation laws that this Corportaion wrote up for their "new government" in 1913 - THEY even have taxes only allowed on Corporations - NOT PEOPLE !
But no one today seems to be smart or brave enough (there's that FEAR factor again) to hold it up to them !
THERE IS NO LAW THAT SAYS YOU HAVE TO PAY TAXES OF ANY KIND ! THIS CORPORATION DOES EVERYTHING BY CONTRACT - AND EVERYTHING YOU SIGN - LIKE REGISTRATIONS, DEEDS, MORTGAGES, LICNESES, ETC. ARE ALL CONTRACTS !
There are only "Policies" and "Requiremens" but NONE OF THEM ARE "LAW" !
And even when the legislatures make a 'law' - it is NOT LEGAL NOR HAS TO BE OBEYED BY THE PEOPLE UNLESS IT IN AGREEMENT WITH THE CONSTITUTION WHICH IS THE LAW OF THE LAND !
Click here to reply to this post
|
- Re: Re: Is Our Tax Code Biblical?
| Posted On: 04/26/07 11:38:31 AM | | Age 26, IN | The U.S. was NOT set up as a NO-TAX NATION. The Constitution allows for taxation. The founders were not against taxation at all, what the were against was taxation on anything and everything "without representation." That's all. You may have heard their motto..."No taxation without representation." Also, it would help to note in this discussion that the U.S. is NOT a democracy. That's a misnomer. In a democracy each person's individual voice is heard. Easy enough, but to do that you have to limit the number of people talking. Like maybe only white male landowners. Instead, the U.S. is a Representative Republic, where people vote on someone to represent them in an office that deals with issues like taxation. The idea is that those representatives will take the wishes of their constituents to the voting booth. Click here to reply to this post

Re: Is Our Tax Code Biblical?
| Posted On: 04/17/07 12:57:06 PM |
Age 46, SC |
Interesting thoughts, but does the Bible even command us to pay taxes?
The Pharisees, seeking to trap Jesus, asked Him, Is it right to pay taxes to Caesar or not?
Jesus said, Show me the coin used for paying the tax. Then he asked them, Whose image is this?
When they replied, Caesars, He said to them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things that are Caesars, and to God what is Gods.
Most people casually dismiss this as a clear command by Jesus that we ought to pay our taxes. But is it?
Some patriotically insist that our American form of government is unique and that paying our taxes in no way amounts to paying some foreign imposed dictator Caesar and that those taxes are needed to pay for government services that we all enjoy, like the War on Terror.
In January of 1984, Peter Grace, Ronald Reagans appointed chair of a special commission directed by Reagan to identify and suggest remedies for waste and abuse in Federal Government, reported back to President Reagan. This is what the Grace Commission reported back about the income tax:
100% of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the Federal debt and by Federal Government contributions to transfer payments. In other words, all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services which taxpayers expect from their Government.
So the income tax goes to pay for nothing but interest on the Federal debt. And what exactly is that and to whom is it owed? And heres the dirty little secret.
Prior to 1913, if Congress wanted to spend money, they first had to levy a tax. This was not very popular politically and tended to keep either spending down or Congressmen rotating out of office. Along came seven men who represented about a quarter of the worlds wealth, who had met clandestinely in 1910 at a private hunting lodge on Jekyll Island off the coast of Georgia. The fact is: the men represented banks that already held a large portion of the countrys debt, having bought up Federal bonds dating back to the War Between the States. These men conspired to make Congress an offer they couldnt refuse. In exchange for the privilege of owning and operating the third central bank of the United States and the exclusive right to issue unconstitutional paper money and to charge interest for it, these bankers would give Congress the freedom to borrow as much money as they cared to spend, so that never again would they need to pass an unpopular tax bill to pay for their spending in advance. All that Congress had to do was pledge collateral against the debt the full faith and credit of the people of the United States and guarantee payment of the interest on the debt, which they did with the 16th Amendment (which was declared passed but never legally ratified). So the income tax was designed to pay the interest on this illegal debt to these foreign bankers, known as the Federal Reserve, for their unconstitutional paper money loans to Congress.
Remember the bankers in the temple? You know the money changers who sat outside and charged exorbitant exchange rates for the temple money that was required to purchase pre-sanctified animals to sacrifice in the temple? Remember how Jesus drove them from the temple and called them a den of thieves? That is who we are dealing with here not even Caesar himself, but the dictators banker.
There is very little lawful Federal debt, if any at all certainly nothing that should rightfully bind free Americans for generations to pay with their lives and labor for the irresponsibility of Congress. And besides, is Congress Caesar? Who is the real boss here in America? According to our founding documents the ones that gave us a government to begin with is it not We the People?
Jesus agreed that the owner of a thing could rightfully charge a fee for its use. That is what the income tax is just a surcharge for the use of private Federal Reserve money. But it goes to an unconstitutional entity, not Caesar, and Jesus never said that even Caesar had the right to steal our persons and our labor. But that is what Caesars bankers demand, and when we give it to them, we render to them what is Gods.
Click here to reply to this post
|
- Re: Re: Is Our Tax Code Biblical?
| Posted On: 04/17/07 04:46:39 PM | | Age 41, NM | I understand and follow your post. Now what? What are we supposed to do about it? It seems the flat tax would at least take us closer to what you'd want, wouldn't it? Click here to reply to this post
- Re: Re: Re: Is Our Tax Code Biblical?
| Posted On: 04/19/07 10:55:03 AM | | Age 40, CA | Yes, our tax code is unbiblical. So what does Mr. Howse think we should do? Do we continue to talk, or is there some sort of biblical action that should be taken? I'm eager for a response. Click here to reply to this post
- Re: Re: Re: Is Our Tax Code Biblical?
| Posted On: 04/18/07 10:22:11 AM | | Age 46, SC | "What are we supposed to do about it?"
First, we should find every legal means to avoid paying a tax that is both unbiblical and unconstitutional. That is good stewardship.
"It seems the flat tax would at least take us closer to what you'd want, wouldn't it?"
No, what I want is what's Biblical and what's Constitutional. If you understand my post, then you understand that the income tax goes to pay for nothing like we have been conditioned to believe it does (and even THAT would be unbiblical, the orinal article's references to Romans 13 notwithstanding). As a direct tax, which even a flat tax would be, the Constitutional requirement is that it be apportioned equally amongst the states, which a flat tax or a value-added tax or national sales tax in no way can be. But none of that matters, anyway, when we realize that none of this goes to pay for government services, anyway, but only to pay an illegal and unbiblical usury to private foreign banks.
The Bible does not tell us to pay taxes; it tells us to honor our agreements - our contracts (which would encompass paying Caesar our agreed-upon rate for use of his private money). If you want to be free from the tribute tax, don't use Caesar's money. Click here to reply to this post
Re: Is Our Tax Code Biblical?
| Posted On: 04/17/07 12:39:03 PM |
Age 51, MI |
The foundational issue is not how much tax or what rate of tax. Nor is a Biblical view of taxation arrived at by comparing the tithe to a tax. The issue of taxation is tied to the Biblical purpose of civil government--upon what activities can civil government spend the taxes they collect? Romans 13 says pay your taxes so that the civil government can do the work God intended--What work is that? It is the work of punishing the wrongdoer. This means providing for a military, a justice system, courts and police essentially. Nowhere does God empower civil government to force a man to love his neighbor, pay for the education of his neighbor's children, pay for his neighbor's unemployment or workers compensation, or social secuity or health care or to subsidze tobacco or milk, etc. Taxes used for these purposes are not Biblical. Thy wrongfully use corecion to accompolish the act of charitable giving. The issue is not how much or what type of tax structure. The issue is what does God authorize the civil government to do and what are the limits on its power from God's point of view. Even the framers recognized some limites on federal tax and spend power in Article 1, section 8. But if don't believe in the limits men impose on civil government, I suppose we have no heart for believing the limits God imposes.
A great website on this is
http://www.lonang.com/conlaw/5/index.html
Click here to reply to this post
|

Re: Is Our Tax Code Biblical?
| Posted On: 04/17/07 09:40:11 AM |
Age 37, MS |
Brannon,
A very informative article to be sure, but I was disappointed that the content didn't match the title the way I expected.
To see what I mean, watch this 4 minute video about halfway down the page linked below. The video is titled "In 1913 America Was Still a Free Country..."
http://www.myspace.com/rickblackledge
Click here to reply to this post
|
Read More Feedback
|
|
|