Do not be bound together with unbelievers; for what partnership have righteousness and lawlessness, or what fellowship has light with darkness?[1]
McManus’ Theology Is Emergent
We look a little closer at rising Emergent SBC “Lead Pastor and Cultural Architect” Erwin McManus of Mosaic, which in SBC Pastor or Human Potential Advocatewe’re told “emerges as a reference point for the future.” The Emergent Church is in its basic essence a repainted/reimagined social gospel of the new liberalism and has penetrated much deeper into the ranks of the SBC than I would ever have thought.
Erwin McManus, the “distinguished lecturer and futurist” [2] at Bethel Seminary has an interesting connection to “World Renowned Futurist” and Emergent theologian Leonard Sweet. Sweet gives a glowing endorsement of McManus’ book An Unstoppable Force (UF). And you might also wish to make note of the endorsement of some other guy named Rick Warren:
“I love this book because Erwin loves the church. Growing churches require growing leaders. This book will help you along the way.” - Rick Warren - Lead Pastor, SaddlebackChurch. Author, The Purpose Driven Church.
“If I could only require one text for all my divinity students, if I could only recommend one book for every religious leader, this would be the one.” - Leonard Sweet - E. Stanley Jones Professor of EvangelismDrewUniversity, Madison, NJ. [3]
In my view having the endorsement of Rick Warren for a book I had written would be bad enough. But if that book I had written was so far a-field from the historic orthodox Christian faith that it had the ringing endorsement of a theologian who recommends panentheistic “Quantum Spirituality” I would very quickly be looking for a torch! And yet McManus uses this endorsement because his own theology is just as corrupt as Leonard Sweet, who just happens to be a very close friend of Emergent Church Guru Brian McLaren.
Here is Emergent, and not to mention dominion, theology as the blurb for UF says: “Erwin McManus offers a vision of the church taking its rightful place. An unstoppable force created to change the world.” This wrong idea of the “followers of Jesus” bringing the “kingdom of God” to fruition upon this earth is exactly what the redefined social gospel of the Emergent Church teaches. However, Christ Jesus of Nazareth clearly says – “My kingdom is not of this world”[4]
One would have to think that God the Son–the LORD God Himself in human flesh–would be a fairly reliable Source as to things of this nature. The Emergent boys like Rob Bell and Brian McLaren hold an inclusive view of the atonement which says when Christ died on the Cross He reconciled not just all men but even the entire “world” itself (Greek: kosmos) back to God and therefore all men are already forgiven. Whether McManus goes that far in his own view but he does hold their warped Emergent view of the so-called “divine potential” of all mankind.
The Leadership Of The SBC Has A Critical Decision To Make
One can’t help but wonder exactly how many red flags have to fly over an individual like Erwin McManus before leadership within the Southern Baptist Convention finally takes note. Let me also bring to your attention once again the upcoming On Target Evangelism Conference I mentioned in Why Would the SBC Embrace the Emergent Church where McManus will be speaking alongside the very questionable Ken Blanchard. Just how “on target” in their evangelism can men be who are so obviously enamored with the human potential movement and new age philosophies?
Erwin McManus is without a doubt a growing part of a very real penetration of the EmergentChurch into the Southern Baptist Convention. I close by bringing you into the Emergent Village (EV) that you may see for yourself what I have been researching for this past year. Under About EV we read: “EmergentVillage is a growing, generative friendship among missional Christians seeking to love our world in the Spirit of Jesus Christ.” [5] Sounds good at first glance but one needs to know a couple of other important facts concerning what this actually means in regard to the genuine Christian faith.
1) Brian McLaren is on the Board of Directors and the EmergentChurch cannot be separated from this heretic who denies both the inerrancy of the Bible and the vicarious penal substitutionary atonement of Jesus Christ on the Cross. And 2) Contemplative Spirituality is a core doctrine of the EmergentChurch with its theology in stark opposition to the Reformation. This is absolutely proven beyond question in a section called Values & Practices. Note also the reference Brian McLaren’s “a generous orthodoxy” as we read of Emergent:
We are committed to a “generous orthodoxy”...affirming the historic Christian faith... We embrace many historic spiritual practices, including prayer, meditation, contemplation, study, solitude, silence,...healthy theology cannot be separated from healthy spirituality... We are committed to...the church in all its forms – Orthodox, Roman Catholic, Protestant, Pentecostal, Anabaptist. [6]
The obvious embrace of the apostate Church of Rome, which Dr. John MacArthur calls a front for the kingdom of Satan, as a Christian church reveals this movement cannot possibly be of God. So this will now bring us full circle back to the non-negotiable underlying spiritual principle within our text of 2 Corinthians 6 – Do not be bound together with unbelievers; for what partnership have righteousness and lawlessness, or what fellowship has light with darkness?
And now also is a huge decision laid by Christ Jesus Himself at the feet of the leadership of the Southern Baptist Convention like Dr. Frank Page who has been praising and applauding these Emergent deceivers who have now penetrated our ranks in order to draw disciples away after themselves: Will you obey God rather than men?
Disclaimer: Worldview Weekend, Christian Worldview Network and its columnists do not necessarily endorse or agree with every opinion expressed in every article posted on this site. We do however, encourage a healthy and friendly debate on the issues of our day. Whether you agree or disagree, we encourage you to post your feedback by using the feedback button.
Re: Erwin McManus: The Emergent Penetration of the Southern Baptist Convention
Posted On: 12/13/06 01:57:19 AM
Age 36, TX
Ken, I'll be looking for your upcoming articles documenting McManus' heretical teachings. To the point though, until then, this article is nothing but a bunch of hot, unfounded air, bro. I know that space is limited in the publication of online articles, especially when it comes to an expose'. But, you didn't offer anything other than McManus' associations as proof here. By that faulty standard, Jesus was in the wrong also. This, you will remember is what the Pharisees were so upset about, "He eats with tax collectors and sinners." Pharisees... that's not a good group for you to associate with, sir, but so far your argument puts you in that category. I followed your link and read the full article. 'Nothing there. I think it's entirely unfair, brother, to accuse someone -- especially another Christian -- and then basically tell your readers, "Just wait for the future articles." That's like a district attorney indicting someone and then getting to trial and telling the judge and jury, "I'll produce the evidence later on." Well, hopefully this article is like your opening statement and you will produce the evidence later on. A thought though: We rightfully chastise the secular, liberal media for its frequently slanted and haphazard approach in news wherein they will repeatedly accuse the President or some senator of wrongdoing without offering any proof. You're a Christian though, brother, and functioning as a journalist also. As Christians, we should be setting the standard and this initial article falls well below the mark. Like I said though, I'll be following you on this to see what you produce and then go from there. Fair enough? Click here to reply to this post
Re: Erwin McManus: The Emergent Penetration of the Southern Baptist Convention
Posted On: 12/11/06 05:30:02 PM
Age 51, NH
Darren you ask: "Pastor Ken, Are you offering this piece as an introduction for a deeper look into McManuss theology? I ask this, because from what I read here, there is not much to go on." Yes, and no. I don't have the space here to develop this idea to beyond a reasonable doubt. Here is the link to the full piece at Apprising Ministries: http://www.apprising.org/archives/2006/12/erwin_mcmanus_t.html There you will see more including testimony from McManus' friend Andrew Jones (a part of the original emerging church movement). You say: "I have read The Barbarian Way and never sensed any major flaws in his theology." One needs to understand the Celtic Contemplative Spirituality to pick it up and the redefinition of terminology. Then you quote me: "In my view having the endorsement of Rick Warren for a book I had written would be bad enough..." and say: "it seems as though you are basing this on guilt by association." I know Darren we've been through this before and it seems to me you bend over backward to defend people like Warren. Then you ask of 'Unstoppable Force': "Does the book itself develop dominion theology... We, the body of Christ do not change anything ourselves, but God uses us through the Gospel to change the world." The whole of PDL and Emergent is dominion theology as you just laid out yourself. The Bible does not teach the Church will "change the world" in the sense you use, this present earth and heavens are going to be destroyed. As the Church calls God's children to Him, as a by product, the world does change but our commitment is to "seek and save that which is lost." Men like McManus et al are man-lovers who simply tell people what they want to hear. Pressing in, Pastor Ken Click here to reply to this post
Re: Re: Erwin McManus: The Emergent Penetration of the Southern Baptist Convention
Posted On: 12/12/06 11:20:11 AM
Age 40, TX
Pastor Ken,
I really dont bend over backward to defend Rick Warren. I dont support his statements on Syria or Obama but that is not enough for me to look away from the positive work he does. I notice you did not address my point, which was if Rick Warren recommended Kingdom of the Cults by Dr. Walter Martin would you take a torch to it? I dont think you are being fair. I just want to look at both sides of the issue. Slice of Laodicea is one-sided view so I know that I may not get a fair representation of each story. A case in point is Ingrid using a Syrian News Agency to support her story. I know I can trust many things on that site but not everything because it is not fair and balanced. Slice seeks to take the high road but then they make fun of Joel Osteen. It is posts like that weaken the integrity of Slice. Apprising does not do things like that so I wander how you feel about their use of humor while condemning it from the pulpit. I ask you this as their pastoral advisor. Slice is a lot like my Dad. He always said the right things and stood for integrity and morality but never once gave me a hug or said I love you. I am not saying you or Ingrid or the people that normally post are like that, but that is the impression one gets from frequents visits to the site. We never hear of anything positive from Rick Warren. We just hear that his is evil. That is why I cannot trust everything that is presented on Slice. I feel a little better about Apprising but never feel like I get the whole story.
Press On, Darren Click here to reply to this post
More on McManus?
Posted On: 12/06/06 01:08:06 PM
Age 40, TX
Pastor Ken,
Are you offering this piece as an introduction for a deeper look into McManuss theology? I ask this, because from what I read here, there is not much to go on. I have not read Unstoppable Force but have read The Barbarian Way and never sensed any major flaws in his theology.
When you state, In my view having the endorsement of Rick Warren for a book I had written would be bad enough,it seems as though you are basing this on guilt by association. If Rick Warren recommended Kingdom of the Cults by Dr. Walter Martin would you take a torch to it? Now if you are going to develop that Leonard Sweet endorses it because it greatly supports some heretical teaching of his, I get your point. Maybe I am being premature in my critique.
Regarding the blurb, Erwin McManus offers a vision of the church taking its rightful place. An unstoppable force created to change the world, Does the book itself develop dominion theology or rather support the title by Matthew 16:18 similar to others using the phrase unstoppable force. It seems as though Eph. 1:22-23, And he put all things under his feet and gave him as head over all things to the church, which is his body, the fullness of him who fills all in all supports that the church is the body if Christ. We, the body of Christ do not change anything ourselves, but God uses us through the Gospel to change the world. Again, I have not read that book, so I am asking others that have.
Press On, Darren Click here to reply to this post
Woodrow Kroll, David Jeremiah,Sean McDowell, Josh McDowell, David Barton, Carl Kerby, Frank Harber, Kerby Anderson, and the Branson Family Reunion DVD Set! This is a $74.95 value for only $34.95! FREE worksheet with purchase!
Russell O'Quinn, Steve Saint, Dr. Michael Youssef, Dr. Erwin Lutzer, Bob Lepine, Star Parker, Kirk Cameron, Ray Comfort, and the Branson Family Reunion DVD Set! This is a $74.95 value for only $34.95!